Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most Efficient Passing Game in the past 6 Weeks

Ghostface Chilla

By Ghostface Chilla,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted (edited)

I posted before today's game I'd like to see him brought back at 5-8mil/year for 2-3 years with an out before the 3rd year. I also posted the best case scenario would be Darnold having his worst game of the season today so we could sign him on the lower end.

I ended up not being able to watch live, but it looks like he certainly had his worst game. That doesn't scare me off too much since I don't think we wanted to win. So I'm still down with the 2 years, 5mil/year. I doubt we can get him for that but we'll see.

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I posted before today's game I'd like to see him brought back at 5-8mil/year for 2-3 years with an out before the 3rd year. I also posted the best case scenario would be Darnold having his worst game of the season today so we could sign him on the lower end.

I ended up not being able to watch live, but it looks like he certainly had his worst game. That doesn't scare me off too much since I don't think we wanted to win. So I'm still down with the 2 years, 5mil/year. I doubt we can get him for that but we'll see.

I think the one thing is that this game may have scared off any potential suitors for him so he might take a cheap backup deal.

Besides, he already made bank (thanks a bunch, Fitterer) with that 5th year option....so he's not exactly hurting for money right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, ECHornet said:

I posted before today's game I'd like to see him brought back at 5-8mil/year for 2-3 years with an out before the 3rd year. I also posted the best case scenario would be Darnold having his worst game of the season today so we could sign him on the lower end.

I ended up not being able to watch live, but it looks like he certainly had his worst game. That doesn't scare me off too much since I don't think we wanted to win. So I'm still down with the 2 years, 5mil/year. I doubt we can get him for that but we'll see.

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

That motherfuger could play for free next year and I still wouldnt want him on the team knowing that dog poo of a game could rear its head

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

Still amazed that he won....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

Passer rating, eh?

Including the game you mentioned, Darnold’s passer rating for the season was 92.6. That would have been 13th in the league. 
 

The team went 4-2 with him as a starter. 
 

Worth 2 years, 5 mil per? Yes. I still think that’s a great deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ECHornet said:

Passer rating, eh?

Including the game you mentioned, Darnold’s passer rating for the season was 92.6. That would have been 13th in the league. 
 

The team went 4-2 with him as a starter. 
 

Worth 2 years, 5 mil per? Yes. I still think that’s a great deal. 

uh, no thats not 92.6 for the season thats for 6 games

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Passer rating, eh?

Including the game you mentioned, Darnold’s passer rating for the season was 92.6. That would have been 13th in the league. 
 

The team went 4-2 with him as a starter. 
 

Worth 2 years, 5 mil per? Yes. I still think that’s a great deal. 

GIF by Giphy QA

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I wonder why he didn’t do career rating? 

Career rating would have finished 32nd of qualifying QBs this year. Not good. His first four years were pretty terrible. That doesn’t mean I have to ignore what looks like progress. 
 

Y’all can deny it, but I know you know we’d be division champs if Darnold was healthy all year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • HeelsPanthersCanes
      Unc Basketball thread

      By HeelsPanthersCanes · Posted

      You're saying the same thing as I said.  Until Jordan becomes an active part of recruiting and funding, this school will continue to fall way behind.  But to say Michael Jordan or the Jordan brand doesn't matter anymore, which is what you said, is flat out wrong.  
    • Basbear
      Tony Pauline: Panthers will strongly consider Kenyon Sadiq if he’s there @19

      By Basbear · Posted

      I have not learnt my lesson and will always want Uber athletic profiles. Sorry, Im a whore about it.... Im not the right guy to defend Kenyon, I just have a understanding with this years draft, numbers, and panthers roster. He is more of "upside/project" and we are talking 19th pick here too.  I know about the years of all the mock drafts with TEs in them and I did want Pitts too.... Look I love the current TEs on the roster too, just this guy should be better than any of them at their best.  Right now I feel OT is the correct target, but panthers as a org are trying to win in 2026 than 2027. So tea leaves and all, Kenyon would help this year. You can even say flex him to slot for most of the snaps and think of tmac on smoke routes with Kenyon blocking for him. I just hate BY is the shooter..... warren, I would say he's the better prospect even without his rookie year, *but he was late bloomer like XL if Im right, plus age was 25ish?? Bears picked love above him, mainly cause of recs.  You can make a case that Kenyon is not a TE, but a moving weapon for offense that can be in the backfield, on the LOS, slot, and even X.... imean he's got XLs combine on some numbers.... He would be better to a offense mad scientist type...is that Dave? or is that bevell?? I think the Panthers should have him as a 19 pick, with others... 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Pens 3pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      That's one of the best power play games I've seen us have in a while.
×
×
  • Create New...