Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold had the 13th worst QB win in NFL history if we measured passer rating


ENC Pantherfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Do you think Matt Corral and PJ Walker are better?

Wrong question.  Matt Corral has potential to develop into something.  Therefore, he has purpose on the roster. 

What is the purpose of signing Sam Darnold.  He is what he is.  A bad QB.   And yeah, PJ Walker can follow Sam out the door too.  We don't need to waste reps on those types. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sam Darnold in 2022 was the definition of average NFL starter.

The majority of his rankings are around 15th in the league. 

QBR is built on a 0-100 scale with 50 being average. Darnold 2022 was 49.2.

----

If you can sign an average NFL starter for backup money, you do it. Even if you think he may regress to lower end starter to top end backup, it still makes sense value wise. Unless your plan is to tank. The tricky thing is, no one here knows if Sam's progress this year will continue or not. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ECHornet said:

Sam Darnold in 2022 was the definition of average NFL starter.

The majority of his rankings are around 15th in the league. 

QBR is built on a 0-100 scale with 50 being average. Darnold 2022 was 49.2.

----

If you can sign an average NFL starter for backup money, you do it. Even if you think he may regress to lower end starter to top end backup, it still makes sense value wise. Unless your plan is to tank. The tricky thing is, no one here knows if Sam's progress this year will continue or not. 

I don't think we'll find out 'cause I don't believe the Panthers re-sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Wrong question.  Matt Corral has potential to develop into something.  Therefore, he has purpose on the roster. 

What is the purpose of signing Sam Darnold.  He is what he is.  A bad QB.   And yeah, PJ Walker can follow Sam out the door too.  We don't need to waste reps on those types. 

23 year old Matt Corral - the world is your stage young man.

25 year old Sam Darnold - hang 'em up you ol' geezer

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ECHornet said:

Sam Darnold in 2022 was the definition of average NFL starter.

The majority of his rankings are around 15th in the league. 

QBR is built on a 0-100 scale with 50 being average. Darnold 2022 was 49.2.

----

If you can sign an average NFL starter for backup money, you do it. Even if you think he may regress to lower end starter to top end backup, it still makes sense value wise. Unless your plan is to tank. The tricky thing is, no one here knows if Sam's progress this year will continue or not. 

it's flawed to take his small sample size run that over the course of a season and act like it means something.  As we saw in NY and last year in Carolina.  The more time he is on the field the worse it gets for him. 

 Sam has never been an average NFL starter in the NFL.   And he has enough proof of that where you can't sell cherry picked games like it could somehow happen.  He is a vet.   You would be signing a bad QB to backup money.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

23 year old Matt Corral - the world is your stage young man.

25 year old Sam Darnold - hang 'em up you ol' geezer

Corral - raw potential

Sam Darnold - worst starting QB in the NFL over the last half decade. 

These 2 thing aren't the same. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Sam Darnold in 2022 was the definition of average NFL starter.

The majority of his rankings are around 15th in the league. 

QBR is built on a 0-100 scale with 50 being average. Darnold 2022 was 49.2.

----

If you can sign an average NFL starter for backup money, you do it. Even if you think he may regress to lower end starter to top end backup, it still makes sense value wise. Unless your plan is to tank. The tricky thing is, no one here knows if Sam's progress this year will continue or not. 

Sam hurt some of these guys feelings and must go.  He wasn't a superstar so he must be torn down.

Like you said, he's average and without knowing what Corrall is, is better to have at lest one known commodity on the roster at QB, even if that is an average player.  The Huddle loves the unknown, if you can't tell. Corrall hasn't played a meaningful snap--name him the starter!  Draft a QB that has tons of question marks, BOOM, STARTER!  Then when crap blows up (which is obvious to some of us) the board goes into meltdown mode.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Bridge qbs keep you mired in mediocrity. That's all we've had since we lost Cam. It's time to suck it up and start the draft pick or Corrall and move on. Let the chips fall where they may.

 

I'm with ya brother. Like I said. Next year we may not be world beaters. But getting there is going to be a blast.

 

18 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

This thread's a fugin' clown car.

 

Says the driver.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

it's flawed to take his small sample size run that over the course of a season and act like it means something.  As we saw in NY and last year in Carolina.  The more time he is on the field the worse it gets for him. 

 Sam has never been an average NFL starter in the NFL.   And he has enough proof of that where you can't sell cherry picked games like it could somehow happen.  He is a vet.   You would be signing a bad QB to backup money.  

 

He played over 1/3 of the season. It wasn't just a game or two. If we draft Levis and he becomes starter in Game 12 and puts up similar numbers, Huddlers will proclaim we've found our guy. They're the same age or right at it. lol

Baker wasn't winning. PJ couldn't lead us to wins. Darnold enters, puts up the best stats of his career, and we go 4-2. That's back up worthy.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

 he's average  

But he isn't.  That's the point. 

Nothing average about being a below 60% completion QB in the modern-day NFL....while not being a game changing running QB. 

and Sam isn't a 60% compeltion QB.  Not this year.  Not last year.  Not the year before.  Not over his career. 

Average in today's NFL is like 65%. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Sam hurt some of these guys feelings and must go.  He wasn't a superstar so he must be torn down.

Like you said, he's average and without knowing what Corrall is, is better to have at lest one known commodity on the roster at QB, even if that is an average player.  The Huddle loves the unknown, if you can't tell. Corrall hasn't played a meaningful snap--name him the starter!  Draft a QB that has tons of question marks, BOOM, STARTER!  Then when crap blows up (which is obvious to some of us) the board goes into meltdown mode.

Cheers. It's baffling they can't even acknowledge a little progression.

Also, I think many of them are just ignoring that Corral looked out of place in the preseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Every NFC team that we needed to lose today won
    • That's a good point. 
    • I actually had some extra money and decided to do something I've never done before...I put 100$ on the panthers.  If I lose, eh whatever, but the absolute complete disrespect is just kinda surprising.  Things to consider. Panthers have won their last 3 road games After an abysmal start on the road, the panthers have won the last 3, granted game 1 was against the Jets, but the other 2 were solid road victories, one being the Packers and one being the Falcons and while some may dismiss Atlanta due to the record, that was their legit final gasp at life and a loss essentially killed their season and putting a team away in a make or break game is always difficult. The 9ers havent been great at home The 9ers are 7-4 on the season but even with that record they are 5-2 on the road and only 2-2 at home and even that is kind of missing the home road split more.  They beat a rough atlanta team at home 20-10 and a 1 point win against a pretty bad cardinal team (yes I know we lost to them). Stopping making 49ers 1 Dimensional I think we're all aware of the weaknessess the panthers have how we are potentially to be exposed by Kittle and CMC.  those are VERY viable critiques.  However, thats in the passing game, but the 9ers are 6th worst at running the ball, they arent a great team between the tackles, and as such our front should be able to stop that middle of the field and make everything go outside which is where having Moerig in a Buffalo Nickel will help.   Before people poo on me, Im not all sunshine pumping, I VERY WELL could see us lose this game, and maybe even get embarrassed, HOWEVER there is a lot to like about our potential.  For playoffs this game has a ton of meaning and You have to know the team knows that, a loss hear loses a tie breaker with a team potentially for the last spot.  They will be focused and I didnt even mention the homecoming of sorts for Bryce and Tmac who are gonna wanna show out back in Cali. Summation, panthers win 30-24
×
×
  • Create New...