Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trey Lance?


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

why would san fran trade a qb on a rookie deal for a 3rd when they gave up so much to draft him?  So times folks on here simply do not use their brain

He was a top 3 pick so he still hits the cap at 9 and 10 million over the next 2 years. The dead cap might outweigh those numbers though. They also have no picks in this draft so if they want to build around their core they could use the capital. Also they might prefer to have a nice vet QB to help with Purdy’s development. It probably won’t happen, but we are just responding to the story that was “leaked.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Yeah DJ Moore is a good 2.

No TE no slot no number 1 no number 3.

Talking about having to do it by yourself. 

Lol when he was “winning” our running game was carrying his ass. When our run gets shut down and we have to rely on your boy Sam you get a 2.8 QB rating….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Not making it, since he's on IR, is kinda understandable.  However, IF they think they have found a hidden gem in Purdy, then why keep Lance around?  Contract wise, cap wise, you go with the cheaper option.

You go with the better option, contract be damned.

If they don't think Lance is better than a seventh round rookie, that says something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

You go with the better option, contract be damned.

If they don't think Lance is better than a seventh round rookie, that says something.

That's the reason the Patriots moved on from Drew Bledsoe too.  Sometimes luck and timing are everything, draft position be damned.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You go with the better option, contract be damned.

If they don't think Lance is better than a seventh round rookie, that says something.

The Pats picked a 6th round QB over former top pick Bledsoe. Sometimes you just strike gold. That didn’t mean Bledsoe was bad… If they win the Super Bowl with him it’s going to be hard to bench him for Lance. If they are in win now mode they don’t need a developmental QB in Lance as a backup. They need a vet to step him and steady the ship if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

The Pats picked a 6th round QB over former top pick Bledsoe. Sometimes you just strike gold. That didn’t mean Bledsoe was bad… If they win the Super Bowl with him it’s going to be hard to bench him for Lance. If they are in win now mode they don’t need a developmental QB in Lance as a backup. They need a vet to step him and steady the ship if needed.

Bledsoe was good, just not good enough.

I'm not yet convinced that Lance is good.

Hell, I'm not really convinced that Purdy is good, but if the Niners think he's better than Lance...

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Lol when he was “winning” our running game was carrying his ass. When our run gets shut down and we have to rely on your boy Sam you get a 2.8 QB rating….

Do recievers have to get open to throw then the ball?

Did Sam Darnold say F it I'll do it by myself and go win the game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Bledsoe was good, just not good enough.

I'm not yet convinced that Lance is good.

I'm not really convinced that Purdy is good, but if the Niners think he's better than Lance...

If a rookie steps in for your injured starter and doesn’t lose then you probably roll with him next year as well. Lance is on IR and Purdy hasn’t lost. What can Lance possibly do to stop Purdy from being the guy going forward. Purdy is the more pro ready young QB so he fits perfectly where they are as a team (win now mode). 
I do understand being skeptical, which is why I’m saying a 2nd or 3rd for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Bledsoe was good, just not good enough.

I'm not yet convinced that Lance is good.

Hell, I'm not really convinced that Purdy is good, but if the Niners think he's better than Lance...

Until he loses, he's better than Jimmy G too.  The NFL is a results driven League and if Purdy can keep mustering win after win after win, then why would the 49ers put ANYONE other than him in as the starter?  I think Purdy is purely a game manager, but as a rookie, that's still pretty darn impressive.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Do recievers have to get open to throw then the ball?

Did Sam Darnold say F it I'll do it by myself and go win the game?

Teddy played much better with a worse OL, (CMC was on IR), same weapons, and a worse HC.  Keep crying about Darnold shitting the bed like he always does, but the truth is Teddy is a much better QB than Sam. That’s where Sam in at after year 5. Below Teddy in the backup/bridge QB market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If a rookie steps in for your injured starter and doesn’t lose then you probably roll with him next year as well. Lance is on IR and Purdy hasn’t lost. What can Lance possibly do to stop Purdy from being the guy going forward. Purdy is the more pro ready young QB so he fits perfectly where they are as a team (win now mode). 
I do understand being skeptical, which is why I’m saying a 2nd or 3rd for him. 

There's no way in hell I'd give up a pick that high for a guy that unproven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...