Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

People seem to be sleeping on Mike Kafka as a candidate


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Panthers316 said:

Why please tell me because  I  just saw shane steichen put a huge ass whompin on the giants defense 

What’s that got to do with how good he will be as a head coach??

Philly has a better team then the Giants and he isn’t the HC..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@WOW!!if you can honestly watch that Bucs game with no in game adjustments and STILL believe Wilks is the best HC than you must still be on Rivera/Shula jock. This fan base is pathetic sometimes with being complacent with being mediocre. Should want a HC who will build a fluid unstoppable force of a team and Wilks is CLEARLY not that individual. Plain and simple

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BEASTfromdaEAST said:

@WOW!!if you can honestly watch that Bucs game with no in game adjustments and STILL believe Wilks is the best HC than you must still be on Rivera/Shula jock. This fan base is pathetic sometimes with being complacent with being mediocre. Should want a HC who will build a fluid unstoppable force of a team and Wilks is CLEARLY not that individual. Plain and simple

There's an interview with Peyton Manning (I think) it's nfl players or a former coach.  

 

Says halftime adjustments and game adjustments don't happen, it's up to the players to out execute the other team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BEASTfromdaEAST said:

@WOW!!if you can honestly watch that Bucs game with no in game adjustments and STILL believe Wilks is the best HC than you must still be on Rivera/Shula jock. This fan base is pathetic sometimes with being complacent with being mediocre. Should want a HC who will build a fluid unstoppable force of a team and Wilks is CLEARLY not that individual. Plain and simple

This is a stupid as hell opinion.. if we’re going by 1 game to judge a coach most of the league wouldn’t have coaches..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

This is a stupid as hell opinion.. if we’re going by 1 game to judge a coach most of the league wouldn’t have coaches..

I just think it's hilarious that all you wine and cheese Panthers fans love mediocrity. Then you complain when the team sucks. Wilks is the definition of mediocre. I respect the hell out of him for getting this team to play hard but the fact no other team has requested a HC interview for him should be a clue. Like a BIG CLUE duh duh duh 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

There's an interview with Peyton Manning (I think) it's nfl players or a former coach.  

 

Says halftime adjustments and game adjustments don't happen, it's up to the players to out execute the other team. 

Of course you need to execute lolol. Sometimes the defense just shuts down your game plan or offense is running the score up and adjustments need to happen. Sending you 3rd string on Mike Evans with no safety help is inexcusable and a forgeable offense.

I'd love to hear this interview. Tell that to Belicheat who is the king of on game adjustments and his record proves that. Adjustments need to happen continuously in the game. That's some basic football 101 ish next to execution 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

There's an interview with Peyton Manning (I think) it's nfl players or a former coach.  

 

Says halftime adjustments and game adjustments don't happen, it's up to the players to out execute the other team. 

I think on the player's side, there's no adjustments, but on the coaching side, they all get together, regroup, talk about what's working and what isn't, and then make adjustments with playcalling for the next half.

Then it's up to the players to execute those plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BEASTfromdaEAST said:

I just think it's hilarious that all you wine and cheese Panthers fans love mediocrity. Then you complain when the team sucks. Wilks is the definition of mediocre. I respect the hell out of him for getting this team to play hard but the fact no other team has requested a HC interview for him should be a clue. Like a BIG CLUE duh duh duh 

I find it Hilarious that you make bold generalizations and make that the backbone of your opinion..  I also find it funny how we need to base our opinions on a person because “other teams aren’t doing this and that” lol.. Let’s just hire Hackett because a lot of teams interviewed him.. Have your opinion cool but at least have some facts other then “wine and cheese” and what other teams are doing..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I think on the player's side, there's no adjustments, but on the coaching side, they all get together, regroup, talk about what's working and what isn't, and then make adjustments with playcalling for the next half.

Then it's up to the players to execute those plays. 

Nah he legit said there isn't enough time In a game to change your gamelan at all. You've got 30 plays pre scripted for a game and might call 60 plays total for a game. It's just not a thing. 

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Nah he legit said there isn't enough time In a game to change your gamelan at all. You've got 30 plays pre scripted for a game and might call 60 plays total for a game. It's just not a thing. 

Welp, let's also be real here, He's Payton friggin Manning. There's no OC in the world that was going to tell him what "adjustments" needed to be made because he already knew it. 

I honestly can't believe that there aren't coaches out there who look at the data of what is and isn't working so far, and start calling more plays that attack the middle of the field/get the ball out quicker due to an injury on the line/running the ball more, whatever it may be based on the current situation of the game. 

You may have 60 plays available for the game, but if all the outside run plays aren't working, you should have the wherewithal to not continuously spam those outside runs the rest of the game and "adjust" what you may call in similar situations in the second half. 

I'm not talking complete gameplan changes on the fly, I'm talking identifying what is and isn't working for the week's gameplan, and ignoring the plays that aren't working the rest of the game. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Welp, let's also be real here, He's Payton friggin Manning. There's no OC in the world that was going to tell him what "adjustments" needed to be made because he already knew it. 

I honestly can't believe that there aren't coaches out there who look at the data of what is and isn't working so far, and start calling more plays that attack the middle of the field/get the ball out quicker due to an injury on the line/running the ball more, whatever it may be based on the current situation of the game. 

You may have 60 plays available for the game, but if all the outside run plays aren't working, you should have the wherewithal to not continuously spam those outside runs the rest of the game and "adjust" what you may call in similar situations in the second half. 

I'm not talking complete gameplan changes on the fly, I'm talking identifying what is and isn't working for the week's gameplan, and ignoring the plays that aren't working the rest of the game. 

 

Hey I'm just repeating what he said. I can't confirm it as I've never played in the NFL. 😂

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • then we're stuck.  tbh, at this point i would settle for just making it interesting. forget winning a superbowl for now. just get a team that can win games consistently and hope that it's enough to get to the big dance.  we want superman. we aren't getting superman. we had him and we blew our chance with him.  find a way make it work and hope that we can with this little guy and quit wishing our lives away for the second coming of superman. it just ain't happening.
    • Gonna have to strongly disagree with you here. Here are the last 20 Super Bowls - only two of them IMO had QB that didn't play like Superman to get them there/win the game/both, and that was Peyton in 2015 and Ben in 2005. Even then they both had that ability, Peyton was just old and Ben young. That said, there were flashes in the pan like Foles in 2017 and (to a lesser degree) Flacco in 2012. But even counting that, it's 4/20. 20% odds aren't good enough and Bryce was absolutely drafted at #1 to be a guy that elevates an entire team and plays like Superman. If he can't do that then it's a failed pick, full stop. Being a poor man's Teddy doesn't cut it for a #1 overall and that's true for any team, not just Carolina.
    • the problem is if we're waiting for Cam v2, we're going to be waiting decades longer.  our best hope is that bryce is better than we all think he is and that canales is able to work some serious magic with him and the scheme to help him live up anywhere close to the potential we thought he had. he's a smart kid. we just have to be able to have a situation that allows him to use his smarts.  the truth with cam was that een he had to have a system tailored for his skillset coming into the league. the difference between him and luck (which was the debate in '09 when we thought luck was an option) was that with luck, he could be placed in any offense and it would work...hence the higher floor he had  than cam. cam, though, needed an offense that was built around him to reach his potential. he could have done alright in a more pro-style offense, but to reach his ceiling (which was seen by a lot of people as being higher than luck). i don't think having to have an offense tailored around what you can and can't do well is a problem for people who can develop around them...after they've truly identified what those can and can't items are. we didn't have that last year. i think we have that this year. we want a guy who can carry a team on his back, but those kind of guys are very rare. we don't need to spend our time trying  find that guy, because even when you have them there's no guarantee that they will be enough.  championships are won, quite often, by teams who learn to compensate for less than the greatest QB play. you have a great defense and can protect the ball while wearing out the other defense and you've got a chance.  we don't need Bryce to be superman (despite where we drafted him and what we paid to get him). we just need him to be able to run (manage) a good offense. 
×
×
  • Create New...