Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers favoring Levis?

kungfoodude

By kungfoodude,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Thats cool and all but he officially was measured at 6-1.5 at the combine.  Thats a true measurement  and you are not even factoring in depth perception in that photo

 

Also baker was 6-0.5 at the combine.  Listed weights/heights are not accurate

You know what I think already but the more I look at this draft class Matt Corrals, college stats, accuracy, rushing ability line up very favorably with any of these perceived top picks at QB this draft.

Levis isn't on a powerhouse SEC team so I can totally understand why he's shot up in the draft mocks because he always had to achieve more with less sometimes having great showings and wins against the big boys. THAT is every NFL team not in the legacy club. The same goes for Matt Corral, not from a powerhouse program, just a rag tag bunch who looked to their QB for that extra they needed to win.

I'd be all in if ANYBODY like Drake Maye was in this QB crop. Not one(don't even come out of your mouths with AR).

IF there is a run at the top at QB two MONSTER DEs will be there or we can pick whomever we think the best WR in this draft is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Hell, even in high school.

When my high school submitted the team roster to the local paper for their annual high school football preview, I went and looked and found that I was had suddenly become two inches taller and about twenty pounds heavier 😄

The legend of Baker Mayfield has him as 6'3" throwing over mountains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
  • Author
Posted
16 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Let's do some science...

 

/cdn-cgi/mirage/020c0f87d61c068f33a4ff78c891995c10b9506773413970b538114a60ede8ec/1280/https://www.carolinahuddle.com/uploads/monthly_2023_02/1005601057_Screenshot_20230206-1324122.thumb.png.76ac1a0e69e0af0a93b0e5cdb0c6b022.png

/cdn-cgi/mirage/020c0f87d61c068f33a4ff78c891995c10b9506773413970b538114a60ede8ec/1280/https://www.carolinahuddle.com/uploads/monthly_2023_02/339845009_Screenshot_20230206-1321572.png.f32d6c579a64598d008ae6bfc3bff436.png

There are a lot of things that are science, what you just did is possibly the least scientific thing ever.

This is what happens to people when ESPN's Sports "Science" segment is the most exposure to science they have.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

There are a lot of things that are science, what you just did is possibly the least scientific thing ever.

This is what happens to people when ESPN's Sports "Science" segment is the most exposure to science they have.

Yeah, yeah, yeah...

Blah Blah Blah Whatever GIF by Minions

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

There are a lot of things that are science, what you just did is possibly the least scientific thing ever.

This is what happens to people when ESPN's Sports "Science" segment is the most exposure to science they have.

If you can't include ocular data from different picture angles without being a conspiracy theorist. I can't help you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

If you can't include ocular data from different picture angles without being a conspiracy theorist. I can't help you.

Please go review the definition of "science" and possibly at least read the first couple of paragraphs of the "scientific method" Wiki. Maybe that elementary understanding something will make your realize how completely moronic what you posted was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

We don't need sideline pictures to guess at the height and weight of these players.  The combine handles all the measurements for us.  

Matt Corral

Height: 73.63 inches
Weight: 212 pounds
BMI: 28.16
Arm Length: 30.75 inches
Hand Size: 9.63 inches
Wingspan: 74.500 inches
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Please go review the definition of "science" and possibly at least read the first couple of paragraphs of the "scientific method" Wiki. Maybe that elementary understanding something will make your realize how completely moronic what you posted was.

You who take every word literal for the sake of argument aren't worth my time.

You ain't talking about nothing just trying to pick sht apart with nothing to add.

You want to talk about a word that has a lot less meaning since 2019.

Matt Corral is taller. 

Stop It Golden Girls GIF by TV Land

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • woahfraze
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By woahfraze · Posted

      Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
    • shaq
      Jalen Ramsey

      By shaq · Posted

      Totally agree with you, if we had invested in drafting a corner or two I wouldn’t even ponder adding Ramsey. But, to be honest we legit added nobody to our corner room this offseason we have nobody worth developing. Even if Chau Smith Wade is better then what I think, he is the only guy we have invested draft capital into outside of our starters.
    • shaq
      Jalen Ramsey

      By shaq · Posted

      Look at his snap counts, your telling me that his entire college and pro football career every coach he has had has misused him? No offense but I don’t think you understand the role of a slot corner. Mike Jackson is the literal definition of an outside zone corner, he would be totally inept as a slot corner. Ala why he has been an outside corner his entire career.
×
×
  • Create New...