Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Potential Coaching Staff


razorwolf
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, razorwolf said:

JMO

Staff Id like to see join the staff:

OC: Brian Johnson

QB: Kevin Patullo

DB: Kris Richard

CB: Marquand Manuel

Asst. LB: Luke Kuechly

Luke, as good as he is, would be a terrible LB coach.  You can't teach natural abilities.  I think he would be one hell of a DC though.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Luke, as good as he is, would be a terrible LB coach.  You can't teach natural abilities.  I think he would be one hell of a DC though.

Where do you ‘hide’ him until he can take that big step or, do you think he is ready now?  I agree he will make a great DC, just not sure the path within the Panthers that takes him there.

Would be a dream to have Evero for a couple years and then elevate Luke to DC, if he is ready at that point.

Edited by bythenbrs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

Where do you ‘hide’ him until he can take that big step or, do you think he is ready now?  I agree he will make a great DC, just not sure the path within the Panthers that takes him there.

Would be a dream to have Evero for a couple years and then elevate Luke to DC, if he is ready at that point.

I don't think he wants to coach.  If he did I would certainly give him a shot. But the great ones never seem to be able to coach their position.  I think their expectations are so high that nobody can live up to them.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Luke, as good as he is, would be a terrible LB coach.  You can't teach natural abilities.  I think he would be one hell of a DC though.

He'd probably make a good OC, to be honest. He understands offensive plays backwards, forwards, by the QB calls, the gestures of the opposing coaches, the sweat on the WRs...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, razorwolf said:

JMO

Staff Id like to see join the staff:

OC: Brian Johnson

QB: Kevin Patullo

DB: Kris Richard

CB: Marquand Manuel

Asst. LB: Luke Kuechly

As much as I'd love Pataullo and Johnson we'd probably only be able to get one as I doubt the eagles let them both interview here unless it was for a promotion and in that case it would need to be something like Pataullo OC and Johnson QB/Passing Game Coordinator or something. Pataullo taking a demotion probably doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...