Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Was Not Impress With Matt Moore Today


Guest Jake Delhomme 17

Recommended Posts

You guys are drama queens. One game and Moore is already being criticized. He had ONE pick (I repeat, ONE) that was a pretty heady play by a DB and he connected with Steve on a great pass play. Sure, he missed a TD throw, but Jake makes a million bad throws. Oh yeah, and Moore hit more than 1-2 guys today.

F the haters, Moore gets my congrats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Moore is God! The same mentality that drove people to see Jake as anything more than a glorified back-up QB for the last few years is the same Jedi Mind Trick that is deceiving people into believing that Moore is a genuine NFL starter.

Be for real, people! No Jake! No Moore!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore played marginally, but he's NOT he long term answer. He managed one TD scoring drive at the outset of the game and was held to 3 FGs the remainder. This is far from an eye-poping performance. Coming versus an 1-10 opponent makes the feat even less impressive. Tampa very well could have beaten us if Freeman wouldn't have thrown most of his picks in the redzone and Barth missed two EASY FGs.

The victory had little to do with Moore as it did Freeman making critical mistakes and our defense getting LUCKY at the right time.

Unfortunately, that was probably our last W of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those complaining about the pick, really it was no different from many of Jake's picks. We just seem to be snake bitten this year. Balls seem to be always bouncing off our receivers right into the hands of the oppossing team. After the pick last week off of Smitty's leg I am not surprised by anything. Seems NO has all the luck this year that we had last year. I wasn't impressed with Moore either but I didn't expact that much out of him. Until we get a more imaginative offensive scheme and better play calling, no one with have much luck with this offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Moore was exactly what people claimed he would be and why he should replace Jake. Moore ain't great or even that good. What Moore gives you is a mobile QB who simply will not shoot the team in the foot repeatedly taking them out of a game. Moore will let the rest of the team win or lose. Jake too many times took the game away from the rest of the team. Plus, Moore can hit an open Smitty on a go route....Jake gets that open throw picked or puts it out of reach for Smitty.

but like many have said....both Moore and Jake are victims of a poorly coached offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those complaining about the pick, really it was no different from many of Jake's picks. We just seem to be snake bitten this year. Balls seem to be always bouncing off our receivers right into the hands of the oppossing team. After the pick last week off of Smitty's leg I am not surprised by anything. Seems NO has all the luck this year that we had last year. I wasn't impressed with Moore either but I didn't expact that much out of him. Until we get a more imaginative offensive scheme and better play calling, no one with have much luck with this offense.

No matter the outcome, you always seem to come off sounding as if you will defend Jake to his grave, very "John Fox like" it seems.

I don't get you people complaining about Moore. He got us a W without making us look like a sh!t team. What do you expect for someone who has rode the pine with us for 3 years, and his 4th NFL start ever?

The way we prepare, I'm sure he get's very few reps in practice as well.......so quit with the bullsh!t people.

:sleep:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...