Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith with Bryce Young


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Cool story. Every scout/analyst in the league knows Young is a top 10 talent, but can also acknowledge the risk. Keep pulling for Strong/Corral/Trask because it’s working out so well. Your boy Baker is about to take Trask’s job on a backup’s salary btw.

Your boy Baker, you Baker lover, I never was. 

Who you got Jimmy?! Who are your picks? Past picks? You talk, back some sht up bro.

You leave out Justin Herbert and Micah Parsons and Kyle Pitts to try to make your foolish argument seem plausible. 

Give credit on hits as well as missed if you are actually trying to be honest instead of a knuckle dragger.

Corral and Trask are NFL players living the dream, where was I wrong? They obviously deserve to be there or they wouldn't be collecting CHECKS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rippadonn said:

Your boy Baker, you Baker lover, I never was. 

Who you got Jimmy?! Who are your picks? Past picks? You talk, back some sht up bro.

You leave out Justin Herbert and Micah Parsons and Kyle Pitts to try to make your foolish argument seem plausible. 

Give credit on hits as well as missed if you are actually trying to be honest instead of a knuckle dragger.

Corral and Trask are NFL players living the dream, where was I wrong? They obviously deserve to be there or they wouldn't be collecting CHECKS.

😂 You called the top LB, TE, and number 2 QB of those drafts! Damn man my bad you are legit…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

😂 You called the top LB, TE, and number 2 QB of those drafts! Damn man my bad you are legit…

NO . I was on the Kyle Pitts in the first Kyle Trask in the second that year.

I was also on the Parsons in the first Trask in the second bandwagon.

Pitts was picked ahead of our pick so Parsons was available and we passed on him.

I can remember sht Jimmy YOU forget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

NO . I was on the Kyle Pitts in the first Kyle Trask in the second that year.

I was also on the Parsons in the first Trask in the second bandwagon.

Pitts was picked ahead of our pick so Parsons was available and we passed on him.

I can remember sht Jimmy YOU forget.

Right. You getting all worked up man. Calling out elite picks is nothing special. Trolling the board for Strong and Corral is going to come back to bite you. It’s just part of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Right. You getting all worked up man. Calling out elite picks is nothing special. Trolling the board for Strong and Corral is going to come back to bite you. It’s just part of it. 

Elite picks?! Again, wrong. None of my picks were considered elite until AFTER. Pitts, we couldn't get him, Parsons, IF everyone knew Parsons or Herbert we're elite the Panthers would have moved heaven and earth for Herbert and would have took Parsons instead of Horn iirc?

Picking isn't easy Jimmy. Watch and learn. Who were your picks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rippadonn said:

Elite picks?! Again, wrong. None of my picks were considered elite until AFTER. Pitts, we couldn't get him, Parsons, IF everyone knew Parsons or Herbert we're elite the Panthers would have moved heaven and earth for Herbert and would have took Parsons instead of Horn iirc?

Picking isn't easy Jimmy. Watch and learn. Who were your picks?

Herbert was the number 2 QB drafted in the top 10. Pitts was a TE drafted in the top 10 (and I’m not sure they make that same pick in a redraft), and Parsons was the top LB in his draft by a mile. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I consider last year Bryce's rookie year.....and I expect some regression/D adjustment in his second season in Canales' O.  Film is film.   So yeah, I agree....he won't be the dude that opened up the year week 1 or closed the door week 17.  We will get some dude in between it all most likely.  Which IMO puts us in a really awkward no man's land with Bryce.   
    • The question is which Bryce shows up game 1. Do we get week 2 (2024) Bryce, or week 18 (2024) Bryce?  I will say that his progression after the benching last year was amazing. He literally got better every game - sans Dallas. Like every week he did something we hadn't seen him do before. And it wasn't luck, toss it up for grabs plays like Penix did against Carolina. Penix was just throwing the ball as hard as he could in the direction of a receiver and hoping they'd make a play for him. What we saw from Bryce was different. Decision making, reading defenses, recognizing blitzes and where they were coming from, knowing his hot, avoiding pressure and manipulating the pocket, throwing with anticipation, taking shots downfield, and running the ball surprisingly well. Stats don't always tell the story. Did he miss some throws that he should have made - sure did. But the clutch gene is strong with this one. One score game and Carolina has the ball with 2 minutes on the clock - I'm confident he'll give them a chance to win more than he doesn't. 
    • I really like David Moore. He's a reliable WR. Smart, doesn't drop the ball and he's where he's supposed to be. Now, he ain't gonna route up a DB. He ain't gonna 50/50 ball a DB. He ain't gonna run by a DB either. But he runs a good enough route and catches the ball - definitely an NFL average WR. Every team could use a David Moore. Now if this receiving group can force Dan and Dave to let him go, then this team has come a long way since 2023. A LONG way. But I will say that Horn's speed is a big deal. They don't really have another guy with speed and quickness to blow the top off the defense and make guys miss in space after the catch, though he is still a rookie and hasn't done it in the NFL. If he and Renfrow push Moore out, then we might actually have something gents. Plus I see Renfrow as Thielen's replacement in 2026. I just don't think Coker is the reliable, move the chains guy like Thielen. Could be wrong. 
×
×
  • Create New...