Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looking at Success or Failure of top 10 to 12 QBs since 2000

Hoenheim

By Hoenheim,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Luciu5 Veteran

Luciu5

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, uncfan888 said:

Nobody is reading your wall of text @CPantherKing

 

Especially when you make it obvious in every negative post that you hate the team and don't know anything about football

These people who hate this trade up come up with some wild poo to get all the picks back.

If anyone thinks Lamar can be had, well they are a moron. The Ravens aren't letting him go. The contract would have to be obscene for that to actually happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MasterAwesome Veteran

MasterAwesome

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

I can't change it to assuage all the cry baby's in this thread so you're stuck with it. I've already explained multiple times but people like to be selectively aggressive and ignore everything else. 

At least some people tried to see the point I was trying to make instead of assuming the fetal position and crying about good or great qbs. 

 

Even your modified breakdown of “bust” vs. “non-bust” I don’t think is particularly helpful. How many people here will be satisfied if we simply draft a “non-bust” at #1 overall after trading significant assets to move up? Would it be considered a success if we draft a Daniel Jones level QB with the #1 overall pick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

These people who hate this trade up come up with some wild poo to get all the picks back.

If anyone thinks Lamar can be had, well they are a moron. The Ravens aren't letting him go. The contract would have to be obscene for that to actually happen.

Rookie QB > Lamar anyway.

If we want a qb to run the ball just bring Cam back for a hell of a lot cheaper than Lamar can be had. Lamar has not won anything meaningful, he is dumb as a box of rocks, and he cant stay healthy. Let Baltimore deal with that mess. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

I can't change it to assuage all the cry baby's in this thread so you're stuck with it. I've already explained multiple times but people like to be selectively aggressive and ignore everything else. 

At least some people tried to see the point I was trying to make instead of assuming the fetal position and crying about good or great qbs. 

 

Well when you typed out Mike Vick and great QB in the same space you knew it was coming. Mike Vick was only a great QB in Madden, he left much to be desired as a RL QB. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

This is why I hate this board sometimes.

 

How does a dumb QB win 75% of his games with no real weapons around him?

 

You sir might be the dumb one...

 

 

 

 

The same way he has his entire life, pure athletic abilities. No one cares you hate this board or you would be willing to spend a fortune for Lamar's dumb ass.

If we want a running QB we have our own in Cam who is actually intelligent that wont cost multiples first round picks and a 9 figure contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stumpy
      Typical Rod ECF Team

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Btw... only Mitch fugging Marner has a better +/- than Key 🔑!!! And, Mitchy needed 5 more games and almost 100 more shifts to get there.
    • Stumpy
      Typical Rod ECF Team

      By Stumpy · Posted

      I was honestly flabbergasted to see Rod send out Stanky and the boys to to matchup against their top line to start the game. The reason that line has been so effective is because they've been matched mostly against 2nd and 3rd lines all year. You've got last change. Use it to your advantage.
    • Stumpy
      Typical Rod ECF Team

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Nobody played well on defense last night. But, the vitriol towards Chatfield (and to a lesser extent, K'andre) is bigly misplaced. People (not just you) just refuse to accept how bad Slavin has been this season. And, I get it. Canes fans (and informed analysts) have spent nearly a decade trying to explain to casuals just how good Jaccccob is at hockey. 4Nations happened and the hockey watching public started to listen. National media even started floating the idea of creating a new award in his honor. Then this season, he gets hurt. It happens. NBD. But, when he finally came back, it wasn't the same. He'll get back to his old self in no time. Probably just some rust, it'll be fine. Only, it wasnt rust, and he's not fine. He's bad right now. It wasnt just last night. Although, that was absolutely the worst game of his NHL career. Slavin (-4) currently has the 3rd worst +/- of anyone left in the playoffs. We've  been begging the world to recognize Jaccob Slavin's greatness. And, by the time we finally got people to listen, he shits the bed! I blame Kash!
×
×
  • Create New...