Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Different Perspective on the Young vs Stroud Decision


Matthias
 Share

Which pick could you live with if he doesn't pan out, and the other does?  

63 members have voted

  1. 1. Which pick could you live with if he doesn't pan out, and the other does?



Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I just don't think Bryce is gonna get this much space in the NFL consistently. Stroud seemed to generally play with a lot more pressure in the pocket than Bryce

 

Young holds on to the ball way too long and this is what happens. Stroud hits the mark it seems when he is in that type of situation but gets rid of the ball a little quicker but with finesse.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I just don't think Bryce is gonna get this much space in the NFL consistently. Stroud seemed to generally play with a lot more pressure in the pocket than Bryce

 

Against UL Monroe. Oof.

Give me the QB who gets the ball out quick and accurate.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

This is really easy for me, Young has the most obvious and biggest negative on either players scouting report.

If we draft him and his size is an issue and Stroud is a great player, we’ll be idiots for taking that risk with an equally talented option available.

You don't gamble with the number one pick. Taking Young is a gamble, simple and plain. He and Richardson are both huge question marks at this level and if the Panthers are like the Dolphins with Tua in four years, we will all be suggesting everyone be fired and Tepper to sell. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So you can explain how he was top 10....but won't.  We need to look it up ourselves?  I googled it.  Can't find the argument based on stats and facts. 
    • Well, I think Nike has it all down to a sweet mathematical science to max revenue of what they average person will buy in terms of price....and what the average person will do with a dirty jersey.   Then they construct them accordingly.   and yeah, it's not about being tackled in them but I'm sure Nike knows exactly how each tier will react to washings...and then sunlight, heat, fading and on and on.    Just asking google about it there are tons of tiktoks, you tubes, reddit posts, etc with folks complaining about what a simple wash can do to a new one.    Your washing machine gets cooler tech....so you pay more now and it doesn't last as long .  My son's football cleats that help max speed got a hole in them before they even made it into the season this past year.     Now our football jersey's are lightweight with new mesh because it's totally better.....the end game is always because the big corporations have found the synergy between new and improved and not lasting as long.  That's my take.  I think everything is made to wear out sooner under the guise of but it's better today. 
    • I know Svech is hot but I still like Jarvy with Aho's line
×
×
  • Create New...