Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official NHL Playoff Thread(non canes)


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, glenwo2 said:

The FIX was in. 

After the 1st period, the Referees took it upon themselves to proceed to swallow their whistles for one side and call penalties for the other.

Rags got away with murder a ton including Shesterkin who INTERFERED with a Devils player on TWO separate occasions with no call. 

 

It was only until the Rags were firmly in control that the Refs proceeded to call Penalties per usual.

 

This was an absolute farce of a game by the on-ice officials.

If someone had told me there was a conspiracy by the NHL, ESPN, and ABC to maximize profits by ensuring there's a Game 7, I'd believe that person.  

 

I agree. Rangers were dead meat until they got 3 PPs b2b2b. You must post on HFBoards as well b/c I saw many similar comments on the devils board last night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

Also, go jersey. I think the canes would have an easier to with Akira than Shesterkin. 

And, I don't mean to be rude, but NJ would have an easier time with whomever you throw out there at Goaltender as well. 

I've had enough of SH*Tsterkin to last me a lifetime.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

And, I don't mean to be rude, but NJ would have an easier time with whomever you throw out there at Goaltender as well. 

I've had enough of SH*Tsterkin to last me a lifetime.

Not rude at all. Especially knowing that our blue line is far superior to the rangers. Marvel Studios Reaction GIF by Disney+
 

Seriously though, I’d go

Goaltending: Canes > Devils

Defense: Canes > Devils

Forwards: Canes < Devils since we are missing two Allstars. 

————

Anything to not have to deal with Trouba or seeing Gallants poo eating smirk. I don’t take the devils to be as dirty/cheap as either the Islanders or rangers. Would be a fast paced, skill based series. 
 


 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

Not rude at all. Especially knowing that our blue line is far superior to the rangers. Marvel Studios Reaction GIF by Disney+
 

Seriously though, I’d go

Goaltending: Canes > Devils

Defense: Canes > Devils

Forwards: Canes < Devils since we are missing two Allstars. 

————

Anything to not have to deal with Trouba or seeing Gallants poo eating smirk. I don’t take the devils to be as dirty/cheap as either the Islanders or rangers. Would be a fast paced, skill based series. 
 


 

 

Actually agree with the bolded, especially in Goal but only due to inexperience.

Defense, I think you also have the edge.

But all that said, your goaltender IS NOT going to be Shitsterkin. 

Just like ours won't be for you guys.

 

Pray we win Tomorrow night so we can have fun talking smack to each other.  🙃

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

The Bruins are starting Swayman in game 7 tonight, he’s played a total of 3 minutes in the past two weeks.

If the Bruins lose tonight, it’ll be the biggest collapse in NHL history.

They gotta try something Ulmark had looked less than stellar for most of the past 6 games. I’m surprised they didn’t go to Swayman earlier. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...