Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Devils Round 2 Game 3 3:30 puck drop


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Good. Hopefully that is the last we see of Pul in a Canes uniform

I think pool can be better, he needs a full offseason to develop into our system though the kid just looks lost out there on everything but rushing the puck in. I also have no idea why he doesn’t hit. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I think pool can be better, he needs a full offseason to develop into our system though the kid just looks lost out there on everything but rushing the puck in. I also have no idea why he doesn’t hit. 

I'm not sure an offseason can help him. He looked just as clueless in Edmonton also. Sometimes you just whiff on trades - luckily it didn't cost much.

But yeah, with how big he is, it's crazy he has no physicality to his play.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

I'm not sure an offseason can help him. He looked just as clueless in Edmonton also. Sometimes you just whiff on trades - luckily it didn't cost much.

But yeah, with how big he is, it's crazy he has no physicality to his play.

I mean last year he put up decent points and goals. 36 points in 65 games, 14 goals, 22 assists. So unless he was on Edmonton's PP1 with McConner and the German there is definitely potential there. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

I agree. Give me Mac over him or Stepan in all honesty.

Pooly while his scoring hasn't been there he does have potential. I think he's been playing ok but to be on a line with Stepan/Stas isn't going to give anyone much for scoring opportunities. I think we need more speed on the wing opposite of pooly. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...