Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Panthers tight end Tommy Tremble is enjoying clean slate with new coaching staff


vorbis
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You are looking at that in hindsight obviously but the overall majority of tes picked in the first are just not worth it.   TG being the obvious outlier.   I mean Olsen only had 3 1000 yard seasons and never double digit tds.  And he really didnt start producing until 7ish years into his career. 

 

If you knew you were getting a te with gronks/kelce stats then sure but its damn near impossible to project that.

Just because some of the wrong guys were picked doesn't mean the position isn't worth picking there. Projecting prospects is always going to largely be a crap shoot. But yeah, every GM in the league would be thrilled to draft a Greg Olsen at the bottom of the 1st. Absolutely.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just because some of the wrong guys were picked doesn't mean the position isn't worth picking there. Projecting prospects is always going to largely be a crap shoot. But yeah, every GM in the league would be thrilled to draft a Greg Olsen at the bottom of the 1st. Absolutely.

https://thefalconswire.usatoday.com/gallery/nfl-draft-falcons-tight-end-kyle-pitts-hayden-hurst-atlanta/

 

There is a ton of garbage on that list.  I cannot think of another position group that flames out like TE when drafted in the first.  And I suspect the NFL front offices know this and thus the reason so few are drafted in the first

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

https://thefalconswire.usatoday.com/gallery/nfl-draft-falcons-tight-end-kyle-pitts-hayden-hurst-atlanta/

 

There is a ton of garbage on that list.  I cannot think of another position group that flames out like TE when drafted in the first.  And I suspect the NFL front offices know this and thus the reason so few are drafted in the first

I'll repeat. Just because some of the wrong guys have been drafted doesn't mean the position isn't worth drafting. If you're gonna shy away from not drafting a position high due to busts I have bad news for you regardless of the position you're looking at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'll repeat. Just because some of the wrong guys have been drafted doesn't mean the position isn't worth drafting. If you're gonna shy away from not drafting a position high due to busts I have bad news for you regardless of the position you're looking at.

It also matters what they're being asked to do. Kyle Pitts to an Authur Smith offense makes zero sense. He's a huge mismatch for everyone and they've pretty much ignored him. If he has another crappy year in that offense, we should try to trade for him. Always hard to do in division though

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

Greg Olsen or Vernon Davis.  

No...again, not worth a top 15 pick.

Look at the direct payback for the team that drafted them, not where they ended up.  

The POINT?  It's much easier to get a TE through FA or later in the draft and not burn that capitol on that specific position.

Of every position, on the field, TE would be near the bottom for me with a high 1.

Edited by thefuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thefuzz said:

No...again, not worth a top 15 pick.

Look at the direct payback for the team that drafted them, not where they ended up.  

The POINT?  It's much easier to get a TE through FA

100%

 

Great post.   You get what I have been trying to say.  Tight ends simply do not carry enough weight to be drafted in the first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...