Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone notice what the unbeaten teams have in common?


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

"Anyone notice what the unbeaten teams have in common?"

Ummm, they haven't lost yet?

Of the 2 of them, I think the Colts go further. Manning is in a class by himself, and 'playoff experience' does count for quite a bit when the time comes. I predict the Colts in the SB, but not the Saints.

But I would LOVE to see the Colts and Saints if they both stay undefeated. That would be one for the ages!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Saints had the top passing attack in the league last year, but the number 26 or so rushing attack, and they didn't make the playoffs. This year, they have the number 3 passing attack in the league, and the number 5 rushing attack, and they are undefeated.

Just goes to show that unless you have Peyton Manning as QB, its best to have a balanced offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's because Pierre Thomas and Mike Bell are way better than Reggie Bush, who has now settled in as a glorified slot receiver.

They didn't have the backfield to make it work. They had to rely on Brees 100%. Now it's more balanced.

Even the Colts offense is more balanced than it would seem at first glance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was gonna say "they haven't lost" but I guess that wasn't the answer you were looking for... LOL.

ELITE QB = ELITE TEAM. You put Manning, Brees or Brady on the Panthers and we are world beaters. We've found the best QB we've had so far by way of dumb luck, it's scary to think how long it might take us to get lucky again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...