Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC rankings from The Athletic


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

NFL executives rank the teams

The Panthers rank 10th, making them the second highest team from the NFC South. Only the Saints are higher at 6th. The Falcons and Bucs are 13th and 14th respectively.

The top five are the Eagles, 49ers, Lions (yes, Lions) Cowboys (😒) and Seahawks.

Rounding out the bottom along with the aforementioned NFC South teams are the Bears (12th) Rams (15th) an dof course, the Cardinals.

Ranking just above the Panthers at #9, Ron Rivera and the Commanders 😕

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Based on the avg rank...looks like the Panthers should be ahead of Washington.  Every other team rank is by that avg.

image.png.d13e0a18c4e4413c9825937a6f6623a8.png

Yeah, they used the median and not mean for the rankings 🧐

dumb but meh, better rankings than I thought. Shows no one really knows how the panthers are gonna be

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Yeah, they used the median and not mean for the rankings 🧐

dumb but meh, better rankings than I thought. Shows no one really knows how the panthers are gonna be

Median lessens affect of outliers in data. At least that's what was drilled in to my head by Six Sigma. God thats an old memory 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...