Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC rankings from The Athletic


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

NFL executives rank the teams

The Panthers rank 10th, making them the second highest team from the NFC South. Only the Saints are higher at 6th. The Falcons and Bucs are 13th and 14th respectively.

The top five are the Eagles, 49ers, Lions (yes, Lions) Cowboys (😒) and Seahawks.

Rounding out the bottom along with the aforementioned NFC South teams are the Bears (12th) Rams (15th) an dof course, the Cardinals.

Ranking just above the Panthers at #9, Ron Rivera and the Commanders 😕

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Based on the avg rank...looks like the Panthers should be ahead of Washington.  Every other team rank is by that avg.

image.png.d13e0a18c4e4413c9825937a6f6623a8.png

Yeah, they used the median and not mean for the rankings 🧐

dumb but meh, better rankings than I thought. Shows no one really knows how the panthers are gonna be

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Yeah, they used the median and not mean for the rankings 🧐

dumb but meh, better rankings than I thought. Shows no one really knows how the panthers are gonna be

Median lessens affect of outliers in data. At least that's what was drilled in to my head by Six Sigma. God thats an old memory 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can be our post injury Delhomme in 2008. I am fine with Hubbard and Dowdle being our Willliams and Stewart.    Canales has some eating to do and hair to grow if he’s going to be Jeff Davidson tho.
    • This season was about continuing to dig ourselves out of the crater Fitterer (and by extension Young with the three first round picks we traded for him) buried us in. Tepper is determined to make Bryce happen, so we're forced to play him at QB and adjust around his obvious inadequacies. 
    • Has nothing to do with the yards per carry, like at all. It's that 17 of his 25 passes were less than 10 yards downfield, against the worst pass defense in the league.  It's another game where Bryce's passing attempts were mostly dink and dunk type of passes. I wasn't asking us to throw it more yesterday, hell, if anything, you could make an argument that with how we were running it, we should have thrown it less than 25 times anyways.  It's that we still threw it 25 times but only had 8 of them where the ball was thrown 10+ yards downfield. Our schedule takes a dramatic shift after this week, even next week against the Jets, they have a decent defense for a team that hasn't won a game yet.  This was a great opportunity to allow Bryce to throw the ball downfield more against the worst pass defense in the league, hence I'd just have liked to see more than 8 of 25 passes be thrown further than 10 yards downfield. IF we were going to throw it 25 times against Dallas, I'd have liked to see a good 12-15 of them be further than 10 yards downfield, let Bryce work on his weakness against the worst pass defense in the league, not throw more dink and dunk passes per usual.
×
×
  • Create New...