Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young needs to ride the bench this season. Let him learn behind Dalton before it's too late.


jasonluckydog
 Share

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, jasonluckydog said:

Vick, Rodgers, Love etc all sat before they started. This is not my original idea this was brought up on other NFL boards by non panther fans  and there was a consensus that he needs to sit before he is ruined. I agree. He is not ready. 

You are either good or you aren't.  I've never bought into the idea that a QB can be "ruined". I mean sure maybe if your OL is that bad and you are letting him get destroyed every play, but the line was great yesterday.  Other than that, poor performance isn't going to ruin a QB.  The cream rises to the top almost always.

If Trevor Lawrence can survive Urban Meyer and that 1st year in Jacksonville, then Bryce Young (or whomever) will survive this season.  Although yes Lawrence was/is a better QB prospect than Young but hell even Jared Goff has proven to be a solid QB after a horrible 1st year in LA.  It will be fine.  There is no reason for him to not play.

Edited by Mage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Red Rifle is shot and we've mortgaged the future of the franchise on a physically limited but supposedly super NFL ready QB.

I just don't see any benefit to letting him "sit and learn". Learn what? The biggest thing he has to do is adjust to the speed and complexity of the NFL game in real time on the field. Gotta play to do that. You aren't learning that on the sideline.

Mortgage the future??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jasonluckydog said:

Vick, Rodgers, Love etc all sat before they started. This is not my original idea this was brought up on other NFL boards by non panther fans  and there was a consensus that he needs to sit before he is ruined. I agree. He is not ready. 

Those teams had championship aspirations and QB on the roster who could get them to there.. We don’t..

You’re pretty much saying we should have sat Cam and started Clausen.. lmao!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

If, big IF, that was the way to go, we should have done it game one and then eased Bryce in after a few games.  At this point, there's no going back.

Why??

The game yesterday was winnable even with 3 TO and bad bounces going the Falcons way… 
This offense needs reps .. The Whole preseason of not playing starters was a mistake.. They needed to play and build some chemistry…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plain and simple this offense needs reps .. They looked off timed and out of rhythm.. WR not making the right cuts wrong routes and not lining up correctly.. QB throwing to spots he expects ppl to be at .. Under or overthrown balls.. They need reps to build consistency.. Most fans should have known this wasn’t going to work day 1..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pantherj said:

And what do you think is going to happen to Young? He's going to be psychologically damaged to the point where he is useless for the rest of his career? Or are you afraid he's going to be injured and permanently ruined that way?

Please everyone stop saying something like this "we won 7 games last season, so now with Young we should win more games." Stop. Starting a rookie QB is a messy affair. You're looking at rookie QB mistakes like interceptions missed open targets. That alone will decide most games, and Young is going to make those kind of mistakes a lot as a rookie.

We might win a few more games with Dalton's noodle arm and more experience, but are we really going anywhere that will lead to a trophy with grandpa Dalton? No. We're taking our medicine with Young now, and I have no objections. I agree. Now why we didn't trade Burns during this learning phase for Young comes down to GM error. Better to have 2 firsts and a second for the future once Young is up to speed, or Young flops we have the juice to replace him easily in the draft. Now is not the time for expensive defensive veterans. Makes no sense. This is the learning phase, so keep the defense young, and then they mature with Young. But at any rate, everyone's job is now tied to Young. If he doesn't develop, then everyone is getting fired. 

I agree with most of the take except about dealing Burns and being better off by having the picks later on that would be used to find the next Burns. The number one advantage with a QB on his rookie deal is that you have him with the least amount of cap space he will ever take up if he ends up being your franchise guy. So why not surround him with proven players who you can afford to pay now while he is on the cheap contract, instead of crossing your fingers that those future picks are hits AND develop quickly enough to compete before you have to shell out a top of the market contract to your franchise QB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, that's what that trade up did.

How..

What is the FA money next 2 years??

Then how many drafts are we without a 1st round pick???

Answer 

Near 200, 000 in cap space the next 2 years..

2024 is the only year without a 1st round pick..

And this is all with a rookie QB pay scale for the next 5 years.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, recceice said:

How..

What is the FA money next 2 years??

Then how many drafts are we without a 1st round pick???

Answer 

Near 200, 000 in cap space the next 2 years..

2024 is the only year without a 1st round pick..

And this is all with a rookie QB pay scale for the next 5 years.. 

It all works if Bryce is the answer. But he has to be the answer. Hence the mortgaged future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lot of different agendas dictating opinions.  I don’t think it was the best use of money with Hunt, specifically, but the concept of OL, I am a fan. I didn’t complain a ton because I am a believer in winning up front, on both sides of the ball. I’d rather have stout fronts than fancy WRs. I have complained some about Hunt not being worth his deal, after seeing him get pushed around in a game or two. It’s no crusade. And have complained in the context of shorting the defense.   They have leveled out the FA imbalance with the dual big signings this offseason, and it has always been the draft picks I am most protective of. Anyway The picks are the real imbalance. If you did a trade chart value of the picks we directly gave up for Bryce, and added the support picks invested for skill players, and put that on one side… then put the little 3 3rd rounders and a 2nd that the defense got over three years on the other it would be hugely out of balance. I just want the balance restored. Defense is still owed.    
    • I'm one of the ones that won't let it go because it didn't solve the problem. We didn't address the center position which was a huge mistake. We were in position to easily take 2 or the top IOL. Instead of drafting JPJ over XL or Frazier over Brooks, we relied on an oft injured guard to center conversion and lo and behold, it failed as predicted. XL looks like a 1 year college wonder and an injured Brooks hasn't even surpassed Eric Shelton.  Bryce was also benched for poor performance, so the issue that many claimed was solely bad oline play wasn't. It didn't fix him bailing out of tight pockets because of being unable to see the field or him refusing to work on his atrocious footwork. Then there's the $$$. Lewis got a good guard payday. Hunt got a tackle payday. Pay tackles, draft guards, if you can.  I have no issues addressing problems through FA. It was not addressing C at all that's been the issue and still has been. Ryan Kalil was the anchor of our offensive line. We had years of solid center play and it showed. Now we're still piecemealing the center position with an expensive oline and it's still a shitshow. Why? Because the player responsible for what happens on the line presnap has little to no experience doing it. We did acquire a FA center this year finally. We'll see how much that impacts the line.  Spending on a center, whether it be through draft or FA is not bad. It's not a position that can have anyone just thrown in with no drop off in performance. A great center lifts the play of the guards on each side.  I don't like how we've built the line because we've ignored the hinge pin that everyone counts on every play. And the reality of the situation is, it didn't solve the actual problems with Bryce because those have nothing to do with the oline. 
    • Haha!!! That's true. Also carry Tomahawks, ballistic missiles, fighter jets, VSTOL aircraft, etc., but none of them clog up the crappers. 
×
×
  • Create New...