Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sign VICK this Offseason!


dmo4455

Recommended Posts

I am beyond disbelief on how many people here responded to Dan Morgan's original post.

Agree with him or not, the responses from some of the people on here are both an embarassment to the poster and to the rest of us that frequent this site.

Well to be fair, as much of an honor as it is to have a real Panther on the board, I think he should still be open to the same scrutiny and frankness the rest of us enjoy. He's a big guy, and as a professional athlete I'm sure he's heard his share of heckling; I think he can take some ribbing from a bunch of fans on the computer.

My point being, be respectful, but don't tip-toe around the guy because he's a real player. It's insincere, sycophantic pandering. If he were any other poster, he would have been flamed and neg-repped into oblivion for suggesting signing Vick.

Of course more stock should be put into his opinion because he has seen more time on the grid-iron than the rest of us combined, but he deserves honest opinions and polite disagreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to be fair, as much of an honor as it is to have a real Panther on the board, I think he should still be open to the same scrutiny and frankness the rest of us enjoy. He's a big guy, and as a professional athlete I'm sure he's heard his share of heckling; I think he can take some ribbing from a bunch of fans on the computer.

My point being, be respectful, but don't tip-toe around the guy because he's a real player. It's insincere, sycophantic pandering. If he were any other poster, he would have been flamed and neg-repped into oblivion for suggesting signing Vick.

Of course more stock should be put into his opinion because he has seen more time on the grid-iron than the rest of us combined, but he deserves honest opinions and polite disagreement.

:iagree:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to be fair, as much of an honor as it is to have a real Panther on the board, I think he should still be open to the same scrutiny and frankness the rest of us enjoy. He's a big guy, and as a professional athlete I'm sure he's heard his share of heckling; I think he can take some ribbing from a bunch of fans on the computer.

My point being, be respectful, but don't tip-toe around the guy because he's a real player. It's insincere, sycophantic pandering. If he were any other poster, he would have been flamed and neg-repped into oblivion for suggesting signing Vick.

Of course more stock should be put into his opinion because he has seen more time on the grid-iron than the rest of us combined, but he deserves honest opinions and polite disagreement.

dude, you can't respectfully call someone a troll.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol. if you don't want to look like an asshat don't be one or do asshat things.

Let's not do this. I made an honest mistake; I called someone a troll who clearly was not, and could be empirically proven so, and I apologized for it.

And if we are defining "doing ass hat things" as calling someone who starts a "Sign Vick" thread a troll, then how many of us are guilty of it? I'd wager that you are as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely should give Vick a chance. Vick, Smith, Dwill, JStew....... That's a scary fast offense. If Vick gets back to full form we would be dangerous. He might not be the most accurate qb but when has any of our Qb's been accurate? Smith will go get the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not do this. I made an honest mistake; I called someone a troll who clearly was not, and could be empirically proven so, and I apologized for it.

:iagree:

In Captroop's defense, he's right that if this were anybody else we would be laying into him right now. If anything, you've got to respect Captroop for not brownnosing Dan as many of the other posters here do. There's a big difference between showing Dan respect and just being his "yes man."

In fact, the latter, I think, is even more disrespectful to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh I went off and fully entertained my wife last night as my emails go to her phone as well because of my health. So she got the whole conversation as it happened.    Like I went to games in Detroit for the cup finals, I've been to games in Greensboro, Raleigh, and Chicago as well. My mom and her nurse friend double dated one of the players from when the team was in Greensboro. "He's still with the team in some compacity as well." I know people who work for the team at the arena as well. How the hell would I not be considered a fan. Only reason I haven't gone to a game since 2022 is because of my health and money situation. Last game I went to was at United Center in Chicago and me and my wife spent around 1k for glass seats and some food at the arena and we were next to the penalty box. The pictures of the hurricane players I took are lost because my phone crapped out a few weeks later. 
    • The Falcons win was a fantastic way to end the season and I think just about every Panthers fan would agree the team the coaching staff and particularly Bryce Young were impressive. We really needed that. Credit where it's due. At the same time. Now we have to establish it wasn't just a flash in the pan. We had one of those earlier in the season against the Raiders. As a tortured Panthers fan I have to acknowledge that. I know you're joking but in all seriousness I don't think the QB sneak is something for us to be concerned about in general but I would be lying to myself if I did not acknowledge that looking back at one particular game last season where we continually trotted out Eddie Pinero on 4th and short on the opponents side of the field we could use some creativity in those situations and it's also a matter of predictability. As time goes on it's something for Canales to work on and figure out. Especially with our kicker situation as it stands.
    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
×
×
  • Create New...