Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did anyone notice Chris Collinsworth comment during the game...


Gscottnc5

Recommended Posts

I haven't seen this posted.

I recall hearing CC stating that he spoke with Smitty before the game and Smitty made the comment about he wanted the team to bring in a #1 receiver to take the prerssure off of him. Then, Costas said something to likes of "Well Smith is the #1 who would they bring in?" Not 100% certain the exchange between the two but it perked my ears

If someone else heard this, please explain more for me

If someone DVR'd the game and you're going to watch the game again, let me know the dialog. I foound that comment interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen this posted.

I recall hearing CC stating that he spoke with Smitty before the game and Smitty made the comment about he wanted the team to bring in a #1 receiver to take the prerssure off of him. Then, Costas said something to likes of "Well Smith is the #1 who would they bring in?" Not 100% certain the exchange between the two but it perked my ears

If someone else heard this, please explain more for me

If someone DVR'd the game and you're going to watch the game again, let me know the dialog. I foound that comment interesting

claimed Smitty said he is ready for Carolina to bring in a #1 WR so the load isn't on him and he can just play the slot (I think they were implying that just play the slot as tongue in cheek). CC said doesn't matter who they brought in Smitty wouldn't be able to get away from being the #1 b/c of how good he is.

that is paraphrasing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather have a Welker type receiver to keep defenses honest. Don't get me wrong though, I wouldn't turn down a Brandon Marshall or Boldin, but having a receiver like Welker to help convert those 3rd and medium-long's would be amazing.

steve smith IS wes welker. We need a guy to replace smitty so he can go back to the good ol' days of being in the slot tearing it up on slants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...