Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Miles Sucks, Right?


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I was told by a good buddy who is an Eagles fan that Miles was nothing special and a product of that Eagles OL and that we'd quickly grow tired of watching him run into the backs of his OL when there's a hole to hit just a few feet away. I hoped it was sour grapes but it looks like he's right.

having that lack of burst or quick change of direction is Miles Sanders red flags not his vision or even his long speed

& if  you think that he was successful last year behind that Philly O-Line then yes you are absolutely correct because more than anything his ability to diagnose open holes & then turn on the speed but no way was his success last year in Philly due to this raw talent as a runningback...just saying my 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bandu said:

having that lack of burst or quick change of direction is Miles Sanders red flags not his vision or even his long speed

& if  you think that he was successful last year behind that Philly O-Line then yes you are absolutely correct because more than anything his ability to diagnose open holes & then turn on the speed but no way was his success last year in Philly due to this raw talent as a runningback...just saying my 2

His lack of vision is the big problem I've seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Icege said:

Chuba has stone hands, so him being in the game allows the defense to not pay attention to the RB on passing downs (or assume it's being handed off).

I understand folks want different results, but let's not forget the results Chuba has already (like a bunch of dropped passes).

The past is the past, but results matter.  Chuba's results this year have been different.  He's been targeted 10 times, with 9 catches and no drops with 4.7 yards per catch.  He's on pace to catch 50 balls this year.

I'm not saying he's 100% corrected his problem, but it seems clear he has been working on it with some success.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BrianS said:

The past is the past, but results matter.  Chuba's results this year have been different.  He's been targeted 10 times, with 9 catches and no drops with 4.7 yards per catch.  He's on pace to catch 50 balls this year.

I'm not saying he's 100% corrected his problem, but it seems clear he has been working on it with some success.

Icege basically proved my point. He said that Chuba had 7 drops his rookie year on 37 passes. Last year he had 1 drop on 17 passes. He's doing even better this year. The "stone hands" thing really no longer applies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BrianS said:

The past is the past, but results matter.  Chuba's results this year have been different.  He's been targeted 10 times, with 9 catches and no drops with 4.7 yards per catch.  He's on pace to catch 50 balls this year.

I'm not saying he's 100% corrected his problem, but it seems clear he has been working on it with some success.

It still makes no sense why Chuba was catching screens instead of actually running the ball last week. His main strength is going north and south through a hole, not shaking a cb after catching a bubble screen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

It still makes no sense why Chuba was catching screens instead of actually running the ball last week. His main strength is going north and south through a hole, not shaking a cb after catching a bubble screen

No argument there - I think Chuba should be getting a lot more touches just to see if he's "figured it out".  I was simply addressing the narrative that Chuba was still the same player he was when he came into the league.  Dropping FAR too many balls.  A Rhule draftee that got an inside track.  He's not that player any longer. 

He looks like a very serviceable NFL back now in the limited opportunities he's gotten.  Maybe he reverts to type with more chances.  If so, fine, I'm happy to see him leave next offseason.  But maybe we uncover a guy who can really help us - a guy who won't break the bank.  We need all of those we can get!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...