Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What other teams could be interested in Moore?


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

It doesn't really matter who wants him, the Panthers will match whatever offer he gets, I'm sure. So he will definitely be a Panther next year =D

Could be an offer with a poison pill that the Panthers could not match.

Also....if Foxy is still here...there is the Jake thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also if we tender him for a 1st and 2nd round pick it might be a good idea to let him go.

+1

its less than 3 mill if we tag him this way from what i have read. that be a great gamble, either we ge matt for 1 more year at a real discount or we get more than market value for him (cassel had a much better year and only netted a 2nd).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cassel was practically given away for free.

Moore will likely be kept, either by Fox or someone else, because nobody is going to come in here and think that it's worth releasing the best QB on the roster even if they are "remaking" the team. If it is a new coach, I'd expect he'd be the only QB to stay. if Fox stays, even if he wants Jake to start, he's not gonna give away Moore in his last year, when he may be needed if Jakey starts throwing TDs to the other team again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I would imagine anyone who would be picking early, might prefer picking up a first round QB rather than going for Moore.

The teams that will definitely be seeking a QB are, Redskins, Rams, Bills, Raiders. Currently the Rams will be picking 1st, Skins 6th, Bills 7th and Raiders 8th. So each team has a relaistic shot at one of the top two or three QBs int he draft. I really can't see them giving up high draft picks for someone who may not be better than someone they can draft themselves.

The Browns, 49ers, Seahawks and Titans have question marks at QB, but would not realistically make a move for Moore as they either have money invested in QBs already OR Moore would not be a definite upgrade.

The Vikings, Bengals, Jags, Broncos and Texans all need an heir. Their current starters are either old, injury prone or questionable if they will be there. These guys 'may' want their heir as a high draft pick BUT they will not want to give up draft picks for someone who will be wanting to start right away. None of these teams would pull the trigger, unless the Broncos lose Orton.

Teams like the Chiefs, Cowboys, Steelers etc have all reently drafted/invested in a QB and would not give up compensation to get Moore.

Therefore the only realistic teams I can see are the Redskins, Seahawks, Raiders, Bills and Rams. Out of those the Rams WILL use their first round on a QB, the other teams all have top ten picks and thus someone will miss out on their QB. Therefore I see four teams potentially looking at him. Despite that, I can only realistically seeing the Seahawks making sense as the Bills have a coupleof QBs who have played moderately well, the Redskins want the glamour player and Raiders want the athletic freak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...