Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns

USDepartmentOfSavagery
 Share

Recommended Posts

mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, micnificent28 said:

You would be wrong. Theres a reason the rams were willing to give up 2 first round picks for a one panthers player. because players that average 10 sacks a game dont grow on trees. You dont get better by trading away one of the few working pieces.

You want picks trade away other assets horn.. brown, icky.

::sigh::

 

Theres always one

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

you are literally the only person on here that still thinks we shouldnt have traded burns to the rams, let that sink in

People dont drink the sand because they are thirsty they do it because they dont know any better. You were going to trade away a pro bowler to a team that didnt have a first round pick til this up and coming season. so nothing in return for 2 years... thats stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, micnificent28 said:

People dont drink the sand because they are thirsty they do it because they dont know any better. You were going to trade away a pro bowler to a team that didnt have a first round pick til this up and coming season. so nothing in return for 2 years... thats stupid.

A) they offered a 2nd

B) we arent winning poo this year anyway so what the fug does it matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

A) they offered a 2nd

B) we arent winning poo this year anyway so what the fug does it matter

lol and what were we going to do with a 2nd? another mingo? marshall? gross matos? first round is the only thing we have done. Right. and Burns is one of the few most recently it seems. Icky regressing and Horn looks worse than Surtain to say the least. you want to risk them drafting a. upgrade over burns with a 2nd? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I will give you credit, Burns was aces today.  Really moved the needle congrats

Everybody loves picks until they turn into BAD players. look how that turned out with CMC oh you got a boatload of picks... all turned out bad. Meanwhile hes scoring 3-4 touchdowns leading the NFL. you trade a boat load of first round picks and Wr proven for bryce when you could have given up less to move up to 2 or 3 or 4 and gotten richardson or stroud all better than bryce currently. 

Thats the real problem here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, micnificent28 said:

Everybody loves picks until they turn into BAD players. look how that turned out with CMC oh you got a boatload of picks... all turned out bad. Meanwhile hes scoring 3-4 touchdowns leading the NFL. you trade a boat load of first round picks and Wr proven for bryce when you could have given up less to move up to 2 or 3 or 4 and gotten richardson or stroud all better than bryce currently. 

Thats the real problem here.

again, burns was the poo today, he was the absolute difference maker, so glad we kept him, instead of 0-4 we are.........oh wait...............

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • LinvilleGorge
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • LinvilleGorge
      Joe Person: Panthers really like Mason Graham and Jalon Walker

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...