Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can someone please tell me how the F...


NFL Executive

Recommended Posts

Matt Moore is second the the huddles 2010 MVP poll?!?!?!?!? Seriously??? We are going to crown the guy that played only 15% of the season? He was our best player in 4 games than other players were the whole season? Come on Huddle... redeem yourself... dont show your ignorance by proclaiming Matt Moore as our second best player of 2010. I would pick the following over Moore

1. Jon Beason

2. Deangello Williams

3. Julius Peppers

4. Steve Smith

5. J-Stew

6. Chris Gamble

7. Jordan Gross

8. Ryan Kalil

9. Sherrod Martin

10. Tyler Brayton

11. Jeff King

12. Charles Johnson

13. Brad Hoover

14. Moose

15. Richard Marshal.... Then MAYBE Matt Moore... over our last 4 games of the season he might be number 2 on that list.... BUT NOT FOR ALL OF 2010!!!

(I feel like I should be on a Coors commercial "If you want to crown em then crown his A**... But he is who we thought he was!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Moore is second the the huddles 2010 MVP poll?!?!?!?!? Seriously??? We are going to crown the guy that played only 15% of the season? He was our best player in 4 games than other players were the whole season? Come on Huddle... redeem yourself... dont show your ignorance by proclaiming Matt Moore as our second best player of 2010. I would pick the following over Moore

1. Jon Beason

2. Deangello Williams

3. Julius Peppers

4. Steve Smith

5. J-Stew

6. Chris Gamble

7. Jordan Gross

8. Ryan Kalil

9. Sherrod Martin

10. Tyler Brayton

11. Jeff King

12. Charles Johnson

13. Brad Hoover

14. Moose

15. Richard Marshal.... Then MAYBE Matt Moore... over our last 4 games of the season he might be number 2 on that list.... BUT NOT FOR ALL OF 2010!!!

(I feel like I should be on a Coors commercial "If you want to crown em then crown his A**... But he is who we thought he was!)

This is what I wrote in the original post, so here it is again just for you.

Matt Moore, for one reason.

I am not taking anything away from Jon Beason, Steve Smith, Julius Peppers, Jonathan Stewart, or DeAngelo Williams, but all it took was a new Quarterback to get this team winning again. The move showed that a Quarterback is vital to a teams success, you can have the best Running Back combo in the NFL and still have a bad record [Eliminates J-Stew and D-Will]. You can have one of the finest receivers in the NFL, but unless you have a good Quarterback that can get him the ball the receiever isn't worth a dime [Eliminates Steve Smith]. You can have one of the toughest and meanest Linebacker and one of the most fiercest Defensive End in the game, but without a Quarterback that can at least get them more than two minitues of rest, the opposing Quarterback will make that superlative Defensive End and state of the art Linebacker look like Pop Warner players [Eliminates John Beason and Julius Peppers]. Every single player did an amazing job this season however, Matt Moore salvaged this season.

Matt Moore gets my vote for MVP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Moore is second the the huddles 2010 MVP poll?!?!?!?!? Seriously??? We are going to crown the guy that played only 15% of the season? He was our best player in 4 games than other players were the whole season? Come on Huddle... redeem yourself... dont show your ignorance by proclaiming Matt Moore as our second best player of 2010. I would pick the following over Moore

1. Jon Beason

2. Deangello Williams

3. Julius Peppers

4. Steve Smith

5. J-Stew

6. Chris Gamble

7. Jordan Gross

8. Ryan Kalil

9. Sherrod Martin

10. Tyler Brayton

11. Jeff King

12. Charles Johnson

13. Brad Hoover

14. Moose

15. Richard Marshal.... Then MAYBE Matt Moore... over our last 4 games of the season he might be number 2 on that list.... BUT NOT FOR ALL OF 2010!!!

(I feel like I should be on a Coors commercial "If you want to crown em then crown his A**... But he is who we thought he was!)

Because all of those guys were playing while we were still losing. Moore came in and the team started winning. It's not that hard to figure.

"MVP" does not equal "best player", but rather "most valuable player". A guy who came in and acted as a catalyst is easy to put in that role.

And FYI, if you count the fact that Moore only played in a limited number of games this season as a strike against him, explain how you have Sherrod Martin ranked 9th when he saw even less action than Moore :sosp:

Agree or not, there is definitely logic behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because all of those guys were playing while we were still losing. Moore came in, and the team started winning. It's not that hard to figure.

"MVP" does not equal "best player", but rather "most valuable player". A guy who came in and acted as a catalyst is easy to put in that role.

And FYI, if you count the fact that Moore only played in a limited number of games this season as a strike against him, explain how you have Sherrod Martin ranked 9th when he saw even less action than Moore :sosp:

Thanks for agreeing with me. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore is who we thought he was.. He was who we thought he was...He played during the preseason, who the hell takes the 3rd game of the preseason like its bulls__t? Bulls__t! Moore is who WE THOUGHT HE WAS! Thats why he took the field..If you want to crown him, then crown his ass! Crown his ass!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I wrote in the original post, so here it is again just for you.

Matt Moore, for one reason.

I am not taking anything away from Jon Beason, Steve Smith, Julius Peppers, Jonathan Stewart, or DeAngelo Williams, but all it took was a new Quarterback to get this team winning again. The move showed that a Quarterback is vital to a teams success, you can have the best Running Back combo in the NFL and still have a bad record [Eliminates J-Stew and D-Will]. You can have one of the finest receivers in the NFL, but unless you have a good Quarterback that can get him the ball the receiever isn't worth a dime [Eliminates Steve Smith]. You can have one of the toughest and meanest Linebacker and one of the most fiercest Defensive End in the game, but without a Quarterback that can at least get them more than two minitues of rest, the opposing Quarterback will make that superlative Defensive End and state of the art Linebacker look like Pop Warner players [Eliminates John Beason and Julius Peppers]. Every single player did an amazing job this season however, Matt Moore salvaged this season.

Matt Moore gets my vote for MVP.

You're giving Moore too much credit. Couldn't the improvement also coincide with other positions deciding to buckle down for the inexperienced kid? 15 of Jake's 18 ints came while hurried. Matt suddenly seems to have all day in the pocket. The O line decided to step up? Smitty admits to at least one wrong read that resulted in a Jake int. but nothing remotely resembling that (Dallas) happened after Matt took over. Then there was luck (beginners?). How many of Jake's ints were tipped, one even kicked up into the air increasing the possibility of ints? I like Matt going forward but MVP? Total nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty simple Moore threw one interception. Granted alot of good players on the team but if Jake was still back there or Moore threw alot of picks we wouldnt have won 3 out the last 4 games. We would have a losing season and QB questions for next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're giving Moore too much credit. Couldn't the improvement also coincide with other positions deciding to buckle down for the inexperienced kid? 15 of Jake's 18 ints came while hurried. Matt suddenly seems to have all day in the pocket. The O line decided to step up? Smitty admits to at least one wrong read that resulted in a Jake int. but nothing remotely resembling that (Dallas) happened after Matt took over. Then there was luck (beginners?). How many of Jake's ints were tipped, one even kicked up into the air increasing the possibility of ints? I like Matt going forward but MVP? Total nuts.

The problem I have with your assesment is that the Offensive Line stepped up for Matt Moore. I personally think the Offensive Line stepped up for DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart not Matt Moore and the passing game. Matt Moore makes more throws on the run than I have seen a Quarterback in Carolina do in a long time. Matt Moore still gets the same pressure Jake did in the pocket, however Matt makes something out of nothing, rather than throw the ball up for grabs, he will.....

1. Run with it

2. Throw it away, i.e. out of bounds or out of everyone's reach

3. Just take the sack

Matt realizes that in order to be a successful Quarterback you have to play smart, which is one thing I really like about him.

Also, what does MVP stand for?

M-Most

V-Valuable

P-Player

MVP is not always going to be the best player on the team, now watching the NBA may make you think that the MVP only goes to the best players in the league, however that is a misconseption. Matt Moore is not yet an All-Star, nonetheless he is an MVP in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would write “give remmers tight end help” on a yellow sticky note and stuck it in shulas playbook the night before superbowl 50. 
    • And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
×
×
  • Create New...