Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

John Fox's best interest


carolinanimal

Recommended Posts

if you look at the john fox contract situation, i think it is in his best interest to leave this year. look at it this way

if john fox stays next year and does just OK or we are one and done in the playoffs. , he probably wont be extended. with the possibility of a lockout in 2011, he may be off for a year w/o pay and no possible contract for the future. no idea where he could go.

or he could take us to the superbowl and get a major extension. But even that is a 1/32 chance. not good odds.

as we all know fox is a conservative coach. he doesnt take a lot of risks. so why would he risk it all on year not knowing what will happen, when he could look for a long term deal somewhere else and have security for him and more importantly his family for the next couple of years?

Thats why i think it is in his best interest to look for a deal with maybe cleveland or buffalo if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have said and is in my sig, This is a make or break season for Fox. Win the Superbowl stay on as coach. Get there and lose.....gone. With a possible lock out in 2011, this is smat business on JRs part and Fox can't really blame him for doing it this way, especially after the way the 2009 season played out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

john fox isnt leaving this year. give it up people......give it up.

i am not saying he will leave. i am just saying that it is in HIS best interest to leave. not for fans or money but his best interests.

does anyone know of any other times a coach has played out his contract to the end in the last 10-15 years or so? just curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does everyone think that coaches still get paid in the event of a lockout? I don't think this is correct.. players and coaches do not get paid in the event of a lockout.. so it doesn't matter if Fox has a contract in place for that year or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does everyone think that coaches still get paid in the event of a lockout? I don't think this is correct.. players and coaches do not get paid in the event of a lockout.. so it doesn't matter if Fox has a contract in place for that year or not.

Most coaches contracts are guaranteed so they do get paid regardless. many player's contracts only have some parts guaranteed. So yeah it does matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. Plus Fox doesn't think like the OP proposed. He isn't hedging his bets. He expects to do well next year and go deep in the playoffs. Any coach worth their salt has to think that way.

every coach should think that way (except the rams). fox probably thought that way this year, but looked what happened. bad personnel decisions and other factors made this a bad season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So dumb I get it, they want to expand the reach of the NFL, but it's not the right sport to be playing games halfway around the world for a variety of reasons.   But one of the main ones is what happens if a player has an injury in that game? A lot of times, you're not supposed to fly right after some injuries, so when they happen here it's not a big deal, the player stays in that town for a few days and then flys home separately.  But that opens a whole bag of worms if the game is played all the way out in Australia. Plus just needing that long of a flight to get out there and back, even if they get a bye week after, it means a ton of travel and needing to adjust to a new time zone directly after another game.
    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
×
×
  • Create New...