Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barnwell: Panthers have the slowest WR routes in the NFL


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don't think this is shocking to anyone.

Quote

In total, 110 wide receivers have run 50 routes or more this season. In terms of average max speed per route per NFL Next Gen Stats, Carolina's leading wideouts rank 44th (Thielen), 78th (Chark), 85th (Terrace Marshall) and 88th (Mingo). Speed isn't everything, but the Panthers don't have the pass protection or the running game to survive when big plays haven't been coming.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/insider/insider/story/_/id/38607758/ranking-nfl-worst-teams-2023-season-giants-patriots-panthers-bears-broncos-vikings

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the type of routes run have a lot to do with it.  Since we hardly ever go deep we don't have many routes that enable a WR to run full speed so it throws off the whole average.  

I'd like to see the details of that stat and how it's calculated.

But it still can tell you that either the concepts, types of routes or playcalling are not allowing our WR to play as fast as possible or that on average we have too many receivers that are below average in speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, scpanther22 said:

Mingo never played as fast as his 40 suggest that was evident even in his college film 

40 time isn't everything for sure and good route runners will be faster on the field than bad route runners, but when everyone has good 40 tikes and everyone is playing slow there's a bigger problem than the physical speed of the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Because it's how fast you run the route, which probably includes getting off jams, cutting, changing directions, etc.

Makes since why Thielen would be our fastest.

Actually it's just the max speed on the route. So you could suck getting off the line, making your breaks, etc. as long as you were running fast somewhere along the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Actually it's just the max speed on the route. So you could suck getting off the line, making your breaks, etc. as long as you were running fast somewhere along the way.

Yet, I would think that all of those things contribute to a WR being able to get up to his max speed on a given route.  Short area quickness or how quickly a guy accelerate could also play key roles which is why I'd love to see the methodology in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

So why is this? I mean, we all knew Thielen had lost a step so that's not surprising. But DJ Chark ran a 4.34. TMJ ran a 4.38. Mingo ran a 4.46. 

These guys are fast. How are we making them look slow? This is a coaching/system issue more than it is a physical lack of speed issue.

40 speed largely tells you how fast you run a 40.   Which isn’t football.   There are routes where a Hunter Renfrow will look and be faster than DJ Chark.  Chark would smoke him in a timed 40 yard dash though. 

route running matters. We don’t have the OL or playcalling to capitalize and use Chark’s vertical speed. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

40 speed largely tells you how fast you run a 40.   Which isn’t football.   There are routes where a Hunter Renfrow will look and be faster than DJ Chark.  Chark would smoke him in a timed 40 yard dash though. 

route running matters. We don’t have the OL or playcalling to capitalize and use Chark’s vertical speed. 

Rout running absolutely matters but fast is fast. If you're fast you're just gonna run a sloppy route but you're gonna do it moving fast. It won't be crisp, it might not be right, you might be rounding off your cuts, etc. But you're going to physically be moving fast even if you're not getting A to B on the field efficiently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Rout running absolutely matters but fast is fast. If you're fast you're just gonna run a sloppy route but you're gonna do it moving fast. It won't be crisp, it might not be right, you might be rounding off your cuts, etc. But you're going to physically be moving fast even if you're not getting A to B on the field efficiently.

If that were true then the list would be in order of 40 times and it's not so there must be other factors contributing to it. 

Otherwise, explain to me how Thielen is so far ahead of Chark?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Loyalty4Life said:

If that were true then the list would be in order of 40 times and it's not so there must be other factors contributing to it. 

Otherwise, explain to me how Thielen is so far ahead of Chark?

Types of routes matter a lot. You're not gonna run a drag as fast as a g you're not going to run a slant as fast as a post. When everyone is fast and they're all playing slow it's probably not because of each individual player. That's all I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...