Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?


Shotgun
 Share

If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?  

176 members have voted

  1. 1. If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?

    • #1
      24
    • #2-#5
      70
    • Not in the top 10
      35
    • Not in the first round
      47


Recommended Posts

I think when better plays are called and Bryce has an offensive line that gives him time to throw, he will be good! It looks like a Gotdamn jail break on the O line almost every damn play. He has no time to throw, and especially pressured up the middle. There is a reason New Orleans always had those stout pro-bowl offensive guards, it allowed Brees to step up in the pocket. Bryce can almost never do  that, so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It took Brees 4 years to start playing well.   And it took Sean Payton who is absolutely a HOF coach to build an offense that really utilized his skill set.   
 

again I ask.   You see that happening here?

You play the semantics game and not use actual fact based thinking.. Brees didn’t play as a rookie only played 11 games year 3 and his 3rd season as a starter was putting up 4,000 yard passing season and 27- 7 td to ints… So in reality it only took him 3 years actually playing (without Payton) to be a good QB..

And at some point Sean Payton needs to show the same ability with a QB not Name Brees .. To be considered a hof coach in my book.. 

By your estimation Dick Vermill, John Gurden, Gary Kubiak and Barry Switzer is HOF as well..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Call Me James said:

It’s wild watching some of you guys go from Bryce has to be the pick because he’s the most pro ready QB in the draft to “Hey guys, let’s be patient and let him develop.”

 

if that’s the case y’all should have been on board with picking the players with the most upside and no the alleged highest floor.

Show proof because I remember CJ being seen just as pro ready… The only QBs not seen as pro ready were AR, And Levi’s… Both CJ and BY were seen as day 1 starters during the whole draft process…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, recceice said:

You play the semantics game and not use actual fact based thinking.. Brees didn’t play as a rookie only played 11 games year 3 and his 3rd season as a starter was putting up 4,000 yard passing season and 27- 7 td to ints… So in reality it only took him 3 years actually playing (without Payton) to be a good QB..

And at some point Sean Payton needs to show the same ability with a QB not Name Brees .. To be considered a hof coach in my book.. 

By your estimation Dick Vermill, John Gurden, Gary Kubiak and Barry Switzer is HOF as well..

LOL semantics.  Its a fact that it took brees 4 years to start playing well.

And Payton is absolutely going into the HOF.  Doesnt matter what you think.

 

Again, do you see Young getting four years to start playing well here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

LOL semantics.  Its a fact that it took brees 4 years to start playing well.

And Payton is absolutely going into the HOF.  Doesnt matter what you think.

 

Again, do you see Young getting four years to start playing well here?

2 years where he didn’t play a full season.. 

At what point has adding context to your opinion become a red herring???

And your original statement was it took 4 years (2 he didn’t play full season) and Sean Payton.. Soooooooo if he was still in San Diego when his play started being good .. That would have happened before Sean Payton was his coach right??

And thanks for making my point if Payton is a HOF then a lot of other coaches have similar resumes…

Last 

He will get more then 6 games and most 1st round picks atleast get 3 years… I don’t remember when 6 games was the benchmark in judgement of a career…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

So drew brees rookie year didnt count.  Got it

He didn’t play… 

I’m sorry don’t you have to actually play to put up stats and show your QB play???

You are being disingenuous on purpose.. You want to go black and white argument based on the years and not the actual playing time.. Then neglect talking about How your Sean Payton comments part of this didn’t happened.. 

So let me help you.. If you want to make this argument use the right wording..

Drew Brees was in the league 4 years before he started playing good football.. And leave out the Sean Payton part since you don’t want to remember the wrong part of your statement..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, recceice said:

You play the semantics game and not use actual fact based thinking.. Brees didn’t play as a rookie only played 11 games year 3 and his 3rd season as a starter was putting up 4,000 yard passing season and 27- 7 td to ints… So in reality it only took him 3 years actually playing (without Payton) to be a good QB..

And at some point Sean Payton needs to show the same ability with a QB not Name Brees .. To be considered a hof coach in my book.. 

By your estimation Dick Vermill, John Gurden, Gary Kubiak and Barry Switzer is HOF as well..

Won't quibble about HOF Payton the coach, will quibble about a 30lb and 2 inch height advantage and Was the previous outlier, himself. Young is in a brand new even lesser "class".

Maybe this will expose this lazy comparison and help people understand what this really is. Calling Young, Brees, again... if you folks continue to insist, here we go.

Brees 6'0 209lbs

Young 5'10" 184. We know that combine weight is bullshit. He isn't even that.

There is a 25lb difference. 

25lbs of 184lbs... pretty easy to figure. It is basically 12%. A 12% 'gift' from his admirers. My heart is warmed by the generosity.

That is what it takes to level your man Bryce up with Brees in a physical comparison.

Now here is the thing: if you give Brees the same 12% while no one is looking?  Well, 12% of 209 is 25.08. So, that is 234lbs!

That is how much of a cheat the claim that he is Brees, is. 

Edited by stratocatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stratocatter said:

Won't quibble about HOF Payton the coach, will quibble about a 30lb and 2 inch height advantage and Was the previous outlier, himself. Young is in a brand new even lesser "class".

Maybe this will expose this lazy comparison and help people understand what this really is. Calling Young, Brees, again... if you folks continue to insist, here we go.

Brees 6'0 209lbs

Young 5'10" 184. We know that combine weight is bullshit. He isn't even that.

There is a 25lb difference. 

25lbs of 184lbs... pretty easy to figure. It is basically 12%. A 12% 'gift' from his admirers. My heart is warmed by the generosity.

That is what it takes to level your man Bryce up with Brees in a physical comparison.

Now here is the thing: if you give Brees the same 12% while no one is looking?  Well, 12% of 209 is 25.08. So, that is 234lbs!

That is how much of a cheat the claim that he is Brees, is. 

A lot of opinion with no facts.. We don’t know what Bryce weights right now and yes I refuse to quibble over 2 inches being that big of a difference…

And you can miss me with all that “my man “ poo.. I’m a panther fan and he is a panther player now.. I will support him as long as he represents that jersey.. If you’re a panthers fan he is your QB now so deal with it..

Edited by recceice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter how good the processor is you can still overload it and fry it or put it in a computer that it doesn't work with or that bottleneck because other parts can't keep up.

If 5-6 games is enough for you to change your mind on guys your scouting department have been following and scouting for years then I question your decision to draft no matter if it's the original draft or a redraft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was soooo spot on about everything from the board environment to the QB guru extremist terrible takes. I wish more people on this board would elevate their energy and knowledge so we could have a fun board again. Cheers to better Panther Fan Culture.
    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
×
×
  • Create New...