Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it possible to play any dirtier than the saints defense just played?


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

his hand was under the ball even if it touches the ground it can still be a complete pass learn the rules you *****... Yeh the Vikings scored 2 of the touchdowns on 3rd and long incomplete passes that were helped by the refs did you even watch the game?

Take your foot of that derr pedall Jeff Gordon..

And do you not realize that if any part of that ball slightly touches the ground where the receivers hand is not covering it's an incomplete pass?

Your being a biased buffoon.

Again, like it's already been stated whoever was covering Berrian in the Endzone was damn near fighting him, if that was not a blatant PI call I don't know what is.

Like I said, if anybody can argue that the Saints with no outside influences won this game they should quickly check into the nearest Asylum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My two cents.

The Saints have been lucky all year. They were lucky to have as many regular season wins that they did. They could have easily have lost at least 4 of their games.

As far as the game is concerned, the officatiating was bad from the start.

The thing is, this is nothing new. 80% of the games are not called right to begin with.

That being said. The Vikings OWNED the game. They had this game wrapped up multiple times. The fact that they had 12 men in the huddle after a time out, while they are in field goal distance, is the perfect example.

The Vikings had 6 turnovers that I can remember off the top of my head, and they STILL should have won that game.

Those TWO things being said. No team in the NFL ever gets to the Superbowl without a lilttle luck (a lot of luck in the case of the Saints). The Saints beat the Vikings with a lot of help of butterfingers, and the refs. It is what it is. I hope the Colts hand them the beat down I believe they'll get in the big game.

P.S. I'll take this time to give the Saints credit for being lucky, and getting to the Superbowl. They best hope and pray their luck don't run out, or there will be a LOT of suicides after they lose to the Colts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DBIG, Saint J.

If Kevin Williams and Pat Williams went high and low on Drew Brees, and there was a no call what would you honestly be on this board saying?

Double standards, and bias is clear in both of your post.

i'd say we should have blocked them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...