Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you want a #1, you go get Devante Adams


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

Those of you convincing yourself that Jerry Jeudy is something special, you're part of the problem. Adams is rotting in Vegas. They'd probably take Burns straight up at this point too. Hell throw in Chinn. If you want a number 1 it's going to cost, and teams that have bonafide #1's aren't going to get rid of them. With Adams being frustrated, that's who should be on the phone. We missed on Hopkins and others, you have a chance to right the ship, you go get Davante Adams and quit playing. 

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Those of you convincing yourself that Jerry Jeudy is something special, you're part of the problem. Adams is rotting in Vegas. They'd probably take Burns straight up at this point too. Hell throw in Chinn. If you want a number 1 it's going to cost, and teams that have bonafide #1's aren't going to get rid of them. With Adams being frustrated, that's who should be on the phone. We missed on Hopkins and others, you have a chance to right the ship, you go get Davante Adams and quit playing. 

You are suggesting trading away two of our most talented young defenders for a 30 year old WR during a throw away season? 
 

LOL

  • Pie 6
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

You are suggesting trading away two of our most talented young defenders for a 30 year old WR during a throw away season? 
 

LOL

I'd rather keep Chinn but the growing sentiment is he doesn't do poo and doesn't work here. Then yes, you throw in both players I want that first round pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

You are suggesting trading away two of our most talented young defenders for a 30 year old WR during a throw away season? 
 

LOL

Chinn barely plays at this point.  And frankly, he has been nothing but message board hype post his rookie season.   Carolina clearly doesn’t know what to do with him.  It’s the tweener problem.  I think the fan base overvalues him at this point.   

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We aren't getting a St. Brown, Waddle or AJ Brown. Honestly, with Theilen being near the top of the league, we kind of have a number one? Which equates to it still being a waste of time. You drafted Mingo, you have Hurst, figure out a way to get them more involved in the offense. But, if you want a number 1 who can just get 50/50 balls, you go get Adams.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RumHam said:

I'd rather keep Chinn but the growing sentiment is he doesn't do poo and doesn't work here. Then yes, you throw in both players I want that first round pick. 

Adding a 1st makes the trade very different. But straight up for Adam’s would not make any sense at all. I still can’t say I see a big point in trading for a WR in decline though. If we are trading players it needs to be for future picks that we can reload with. Then we just need to find a GM capable of drafting talent lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

also didn't realize there was another thread, so delete if needed. The Raiders aren't going anywhere and never will, esp with McDaniels. The whole reason Adams went there was to be with Carr, who is gone. There clearly is an opportunity to get better here so saying there's no chance is flat out wrong. May not contend this year, but damn 30 isn't retirement age, dude has at least five years left. 2-3 more years if we aren't doing something then definitely all hope for this franchise is lost. I think you roll the dice. If we settle on a loser like Jeudy who is basically another Claypool, then fug it hope is lost now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Adding a 1st makes the trade very different. But straight up for Adam’s would not make any sense at all. I still can’t say I see a big point in trading for a WR in decline though. If we are trading players it needs to be for future picks that we can reload with. Then we just need to find a GM capable of drafting talent lol

Is he in decline? Or is he just a Raider? Randy Moss was also a Raider.

Edited by RumHam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Is he in decline? Or is he just a Raider? Randy Moss was also a Raider.

He’s in decline because he’s at the age where all WRs begin to show their age. Doesn’t mean he can’t be really good for another 2-3 years but Bryce needs someone he can develop and grow with for the best decade. That isn’t Adams. 

Edited by TheMostInterestingMan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

He’s in decline because he’s at the age where all WRs begin to show their age. Doesn’t mean he can’t be really good for another 2-3 years but Bryce needs someone he can develop and grow with for the best decade. That isn’t Adams. 

OMG HE DOES. WAIT, I'M THINKING, DIDN'T WE JUST DRAFT THAT IN THE SECOND ROUND?

The entire #1 discussion is moot. It's not a personnel issue, its a coaching issue. HOWEVER, since TEPPER is the one that think's this is the solution, you go get Adams. It's not going to fix anything. Since Tepper has been here, we have tried to make splash trades or signing at really weird times. COINCIDENCE!? No, it's never been Hurney or Fitterer. They're tasked to do his bidding for his middling in affairs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I watched a clip of all the offensive snaps. Young threw into some tight coverage and the guys made some plays on the ball. He also really missed some throws.  He has this middle of the field thing into a tight window pretty good and made three or four nice plays but he was just too inconsistent with his accuracy especially in the red zone. Today and in general.    That Int where people were chastising Legette for ‘not fighting through the coverage’, he in no way could have gotten to that ball. IMO. I think he thought it was going to hit the ground and didn’t see the defender coming for it. But not sure what he could have done. The camera doesn’t show the spatial relationship very well, I think the ball was way off. maybe 6 feet or more off target to the inside of the field.  Rico is a beast. And a very good receiver.   That was my impression without dissecting and rewinding, just letting the video roll. I did rewind the int two or three times to look at that one. 
    • My biggest issue with keeping Darnold, which I felt we should have done, is we would still have Fitterer. And everything that came with that.  I think Morgan is going to be good.  Baker, just did not play well at all here. Not sure what else we were supposed to take away from it at the time.  That’s my short ‘I don’t want to argue about it’ take. 
    • Even if we somehow make the playoffs we will be one and done so fast. Seattle, Rams, TB, Panthers, Detroit and Philly are all better than us.
×
×
  • Create New...