Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defensive transition next season?

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Here's a question born from discussion in another thread.

Knowing how DC Ron Meeks has operated in the past - with defenses made up predominantly of undersized, speedy guys - I have to wonder a bit what the offseason will look like on the defensive side of the ball.

Will we see the Panthers move to pick up more players that fit Meeks' previous MO, or will they continue with the kind of personnel that Fox has tended to prefer and ask Meeks to tailor his attack to the strengths of those players?

Which option is the best approach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mesmer Newbie

Mesmer

Posted
Posted

Which option is the best approach? Or which option is most likely?

Honestly when you have a system in place that works, I'd like to see Meeks get more of "his" players. Unfortunately, I think it's always going to be the kinds of players Fox wants. So, I'm going to have to say that's probably a negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted

Meeks seem to do alright with the type of players that were here. His defenses were never this good in Indy, so maybe there is something to the way Fox and Hurney have built it. Input from Meeks sure, but why change what seems to be working already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Which option is the best approach? Or which option is most likely?

Honestly when you have a system in place that works, I'd like to see Meeks get more of "his" players. Unfortunately, I think it's always going to be the kinds of players Fox wants. So, I'm going to have to say that's probably a negative.

Is that really a negative though?

Meeks' Indy defenses were built on the principle that teams would always be playing catch up against Peyton. Therefore they could tailor more to the pass than the run. That condition doesn't apply here. And unfortunately, teams found they could run on the Colts defense and thus keep Peyton off the field.

It could actually be that Meeks can run a better, more balanced defense with Fox's players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thunderraiden Veteran

thunderraiden

Posted
Posted

Meeks seem to do alright with the type of players that were here. His defenses were never this good in Indy, so maybe there is something to the way Fox and Hurney have built it. Input from Meeks sure, but why change what seems to be working already.

I have to go with Jangler on this one. Meeks put too much emphasis on Safetys and Defensive Ends in Indy. Also he sacrificed TOOO many other attributes in a player for speed. I think he would now have to realize we had a better formula here with out players. Can't wait to see healthy T. Davis and Beason behind healthy Defensive Line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kakarot Newbie

Kakarot

Posted
Posted

Yep, Im sticking and agreeing with team Jangler.

Meeks defenses were never this good. Towards the end of the year, we were even a bit better against the run. Somethings thats been a knock on Meeks in previous years at Indy.

Fox + Meeks= top 10 defense :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It's possible one of the reasons Fox looked to Meeks was that he believed with the offensive firepower or Williams, Stewart and Smith, we might be able to put up Menningesque scores and force other teams to play from behind the way the Colts did. Seeing how the offense looked in 2008, it wasn't so farfetched.

(still, admittedly, a bit of a stretch)

Obviously, with Delhomme's meltdown, it didn't play out that way this season. But as odd as it might sound, the overall effect on the defensive side might have been a positive (i.e. the building of a more balanced unit).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

I suspect that we have most of the guys we will use next year already on the team. The DT spot seems loaded already. We have Kemo, Louis Leonard and Corvey Irvin all coming off IR this year. All three could project in our plans. With Tank Tyler and Damione Lewis, Nick Hayden and Derek Landri on the squad as well there hardly seems room for anyone else. We might even bring Thomas back to camp for one more encore giving us 8 altogether. The DE spots seems set if Peppers returns with Brown, Brayton, and Johnson filling the other spots. Taylor might be the odd man out and got little playing time last year. So we might bring in one or two more DEs if Pepper's leaves but otherwise I don't see the liklihood that much will change. We seem to have a good mix of speed and size so I doubt we make wholesale changes or bring in many guys in the offseason or through the draft.

Edit: So I guess that means I agree with Jangler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I suspect that we have most of the guys we will use next year already on the team. The DT spot seems loaded already. We have Kemo, Louis Leonard and Corvey Irvin all coming off IR this year. All three could project in our plans. With Tank Tyler and Damione Lewis, Nick Hayden and Derek Landri on the squad as well there hardly seems room for anyone else. We might even bring Thomas back to camp for one more encore giving us 8 altogether. The DE spots seems set if Peppers returns with Brown, Brayton, and Johnson filling the other spots. Taylor might be the odd man out and got little playing time last year. So we might bring in one or two more DEs if Pepper's leaves but otherwise I don't see the liklihood that much will change. We seem to have a good mix of speed and size so I doubt we make wholesale changes or bring in many guys in the offseason or through the draft.

Edit: So I guess that means I agree with Jangler.

Valid point.

So I'm seeing the general consensus is that Meeks will be the one adjusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted

Knowing how DC Ron Meeks has operated in the past - with defenses made up predominantly of undersized, speedy guys - I have to wonder a bit what the offseason will look like on the defensive side of the ball.

I don't believe that's necessarily the case here since we acquired several DT after he's been here and they have all been average to heavy. (Leonard, Thomas, Tyler). I originally expected him to go after the undersized guys but he didn't. That approach was best for playing in the dome with a dynamic offense. Not here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doc LRB
      Breakout 2025 Candidates

      By Doc LRB · Posted

      https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
×
×
  • Create New...