Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Lightning 7pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

I disagree. He looks blind in his past few games. He’s not tracking the puck well until people get in close. We need Andersen back asap. 

I guess I didn't watch the Avs game...just from what I saw last night. Don't you think if he was that blurry with his vision the canes would have made that happen already? Seems like a fairly simple solution if that's truly the issue. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, panthers81 said:

I guess I didn't watch the Avs game...just from what I saw last night. Don't you think if he was that blurry with his vision the canes would have made that happen already? Seems like a fairly simple solution if that's truly the issue. 

That I don’t really know. He still talks through a translator mostly… 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BY9Franchise said:

We've played 7 games out of 82 if anything from the past five years these are the anomaly not the rule...

 

THURSDAY we should see our full lineup (maybe minus Pesce) but I'd bet we get Anderson and SVECHNIKOV back.

My comment was in reference to the team being so close on multiple occasions to scoring but unable to.

It’s a common Canes theme that presented itself for the first time this season last night.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

So, aside from the Canes losing- how did they skate? Scoring chances? Defensive improvement?

I saw the stat line the Canes had about 10 more SOG than Tampa, but they scored 3 on 20-some shots?

PP and PK?

Defense looked good minus a Slavin brain fart on one goal. Canes had their chances but just wiffed on the shot. Koochie played very well. One goal was on him. The other were redirects. If our D plays that way we will be back to winning in no time. 

Edited by Panthers Fan 69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DavidEng said:

Ouch that hurts.

 

33 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Someone on Reddit started a rumor that he injured his dick, calling it a true lower body injury.

https://www.nhl.com/hurricanes/news/brett-pesce-broken-dick

Brett Pesce injury update.

Defenseman had surgery to repair broken dick suffered on West coast road trip.

FHLeclhUcAIHD0_.jpg_large.thumb.png.692ece86e524445a372f63a036786bbb.png

By Canes PR @CanesPR Hurricane.com
2:05 PM

RALEIGH, NC. - The National Hockey League’s Carolina Hurricanes today announced that defensemen Brett Pesce is expected to miss 2-4 weeks with a lower body injury. Pesce is at home in Raleigh recovering from a successful penile reconstruction surgery to repair a broken dick suffered against the Tampa Bay Lightning.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It may not be exact science and this FO is relatively new, but it is very much likely the first couple picks will be of players we met.
    • The only other position group I could think of is ILB since Dan was there for Rodriguez and Hill Jr. pro days in Texas. It’s one of the reasons I get the feeling ILB could be the pick at 19.
    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
×
×
  • Create New...