Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

C.J. Stroud: I don’t think Bryce Young is playing badly in any way, aspect, or form

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, GhostWhispah said:

So I guess CJ will let Bryce win his first game by playing like this purpose on Sunday. That's what being friends are for...

 

Why are you constantly bringing up the same college football clips over and over? They have pro tape now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
Just now, Varking said:

Why are you constantly bringing up the same college football clips over and over? They have pro tape now. 

It’s really dumb. Stroud threw like 12 INTs over two years in college in a pass heavy offense. He just looks ignorant trying to highlight one of those plays at this point…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It’s really dumb. Stroud threw like 12 INTs over two years in college in a pass heavy offense. He just looks ignorant trying to highlight one of those plays at this point…

What is actually hilarious is this clip is from the Oregon game. This was the second start of CJ Strouds career as a second year player. Oregon was a top 25 team that year but I digress and lets look at that game:

Stroud was 35 of 54 ( HE THREW 54 PASSES IN THAT GAME ) for 484 yards, 3 touchdowns and just 1 interception. 

I mean... talk about cherry picking and ignoring the rest of the game. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
On 10/26/2023 at 4:01 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't know about all that. I hope that my buddy plays well but that I play better and we beat them seems to be a perfectly reasonable, charitable, and consistent viewpoint.

I think the modern era pro athlete doesn't necessarily lean into the "faux warfare" aspect of competition. Obviously that varies from player to player but in general I have noticed that throughout AAU and HS for some years now. They still love the competition but they can turn it off and be friends outside the court/field/etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GhostWhispah Rising Star

GhostWhispah

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Varking said:

What is actually hilarious is this clip is from the Oregon game. This was the second start of CJ Strouds career as a second year player. Oregon was a top 25 team that year but I digress and lets look at that game:

Stroud was 35 of 54 ( HE THREW 54 PASSES IN THAT GAME ) for 484 yards, 3 touchdowns and just 1 interception. 

I mean... talk about cherry picking and ignoring the rest of the game. 

I didn't watch that Ducks game at all nor the highlights but this is one of the best "short" clips on a pick ever conceived where it was shown from 3 different angles at show motion. It would win an award for best clips in college ball ever on bad picks. Bryce had NEVER had a pick or play this bad and i watch every Bama game of his. If you can find a worse play from Bryce, i will NEVER play this clip that seems to bother you so much again. Good luck on that cause it doesn't exist!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, GhostWhispah said:

I didn't watch that Ducks game at all nor the highlights but this is one of the best "short" clips on a pick ever conceived where it was shown from 3 different angles at show motion. It would win an award for best clips in college ball ever on bad picks. Bryce had NEVER had a pick or play this bad and i watch every Bama game of his. If you can find a worse play from Bryce, i will NEVER play this clip that seems to bother you so much again. Good luck on that cause it doesn't exist!

Cost his team the natty with it was significantly worse. Thank you for no longer playing the other clip. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GhostWhispah Rising Star

GhostWhispah

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Varking said:

Why are you constantly bringing up the same college football clips over and over? They have pro tape now. 

Okay here's a "short" clip i play MUCH more often which should win an award on cause its happens every season for this guy. For those fans here who wanted him back with Wilks, TAKE THAT!!!!!

THE BIGGEST BUST EVER CAUSE HE PREFER PASSING TO GHOSTS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...