Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peppers- You make the deal


Nu Guns

Recommended Posts

1. Phi- kolb and 2nd pick

2. Ne- 1st rd pick

3. Clev- quinn or cribbs with a 2nd or 3rd rd pick

4. arz/den - strait up trade for boldin or marshall

5. keep peppers at all costs

These are all hypothetical ....but its what I would like!

Any of these but #5. I want Peppers but he is not worth a million or more per game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The years uncapped so I don't really care about the monetary part.

what I really liked was that somebody propsed trading him for a high first round pick. We trade down. Pickup a DE, DT, and WR in no specific order. We'd be sitting pretty. And have lots of extra cash. We would definately need a guy who would pass rush or we'll suck hard next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What team would trade for a defensive end who is going to be 30 years old that will make twenty million? The only way we can trade him would be to franchise tag him and try to get him the sign to tender, which we should know isn't a guarantee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do the reverse, front load him a long term deal.... no cap next year and many questions about 11 anyway. I dont think he will get traded with the tag on him anyway and no action is a sad possibility to begin with. Who can with a straight face actually say: "The Panthers defense is better without Peppers."?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do the reverse, front load him a long term deal.... no cap next year and many questions about 11 anyway. I dont think he will get traded with the tag on him anyway and no action is a sad possibility to begin with. Who can with a straight face actually say: "The Panthers defense is better without Peppers."?[/QUOTE]

I anxious to see if we can be.

JMO....I'm ok if he stays or go's. What ever is best for the TEAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Schefter just reported that we will likely let him go for free

We better do something big with that 16 million bucks that we are saving then.

I have confidence that we can do something with the guys we have on defense but we need to add some players with that extra money, whether it be at WR or DT.

If we aren't paying Peppers that means we have enough to sign TD and Marshall to new deals. It also means that we can probably upgrade the #2 WR spot with a guy like Breaston, Floyd, or Antonio Bryant. I'd also like to take a look at Hampton, Wilfork, and Pickett in FA to play NT instead of paying Maake a 9 million dollar roster bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...