Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Basketball 2023


beo
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

UNC gets the win, but it wasn't a good one. If State hadn't gone so cold in the second half, this would have been a better game and maybe with a different outcome.

A 9 pt win against a rival is fine with me.  State played well in the first half today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I saw an article today where Bronny James is reportedly considering staying another year at USC to "improve his draft stock". Bruh... he's averaging 5ppg coming off the bench for a team that's 12-17. Draft stock???

 

And at the start of the season people were acting like he was the second coming of his dad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I saw an article today where Bronny James is reportedly considering staying another year at USC to "improve his draft stock". Bruh... he's averaging 5ppg coming off the bench for a team that's 12-17. Draft stock???

 

lol he's getting drafted regardless. He's Lebron son and just because of that some team will reach just because it might mean they get Lebron.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...