Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Basketball 2023


beo
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

Idk what the guys in pre game were saying, just telling you the facts. Like yeah UNC was a projected 1 seed going into the game, that doesn’t mean that can’t change with a bad loss and a huge win from a team they are otherwise neck and neck with. The only thing they had on Iowa State before tonight was one less loss. Give that up in a loss to a non tourney team what do they have?

Next time listen to the professionals.

 

I respect your passion though. I knew UNC would get the #1 seed simply because the "professionals" said they were a lock even if they loss.

 

How's that humble pie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

West Region

UNC

Arizona

Baylor

Alabama

It was GUARANTEED we were getting paired with Arizona. The selection committee LOVES those potential storylines. Yep, they're already talking about it. LOL

The media had the ACC wildly underrated. ESPN only has four teams projected in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It was GUARANTEED we were getting paired with Arizona. The selection committee LOVES those potential storylines. Yep, they're already talking about it. LOL

The media had the ACC wildly underrated. ESPN only has four teams projected in.

They sure gave Arizona what appears to be an easy path to the sweet 16. Carolina will have a tougher time with Michigan State or Mississippi State but I think the bracket sets up nicely for a UNC/Zona matchup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At first glance, the East Region is tough. The top four seeds in that region are playing their best basketball right now.

As for UNC, I think their region sets up nicely for a showdown with Arizona but there’s a lot of unpredictability about who UNC and Zona will face to get there. Strong potential for some upsets in that region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Shocker said:

You were saying?  Iowa State’s non-conference schedule was shet

Lol, name something I said that was non factual. I was always open to the possibility of either team getting the one seed. As a fan I wanted UNC to get it. Fact is, UNC is fortunate not to lose that 1 seed, and you are fortunate to get bailed out after acting like a smug ass for zero reason when you clearly didn’t realize how close it was. Your whole reasoning of what the “experts” said, lol, let’s talk about how the experts were talking all day about whether it would be Iowa State or UNC as the final 1. According to them it wasn’t the “lock” for UNC that you were selling. A broken clock is right twice per day, doesn’t change anything about you looking uninformed and arrogant in your ignorance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

I wouldn't even consider that trash talk. It's soft and you're having a fit over it.

For someone that said they didn't care about winning the tournament, you're taking the L badly. As you said, State wanted it more and they handled business unlike the Heels. They, like their fans, seemed to think the game was in the bag before it was even played.

He's SUCH a hypocrite. He rags on other teams all the time, but as soon as someone rags on his team he gets upset.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Lol, name something I said that was non factual. I was always open to the possibility of either team getting the one seed. As a fan I wanted UNC to get it. Fact is, UNC is fortunate not to lose that 1 seed, and you are fortunate to get bailed out after acting like a smug ass for zero reason when you clearly didn’t realize how close it was. Your whole reasoning of what the “experts” said, lol, let’s talk about how the experts were talking all day about whether it would be Iowa State or UNC as the final 1. According to them it wasn’t the “lock” for UNC that you were selling. A broken clock is right twice per day, doesn’t change anything about you looking uninformed and arrogant in your ignorance.

LMAO just admit you were wrong buddy. The more you lie the more you will look bad.

 

You can't always be right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that’s where a lot of people struggle to see it with Bryce Bryce is never physically going to “wow” anyone. Which will ultimately keep him out of that elite QB tier.  Burrow, Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Maye, Stafford People want to put Herbert in that tier because he’s the ultimate highlight type QB. Highlights in this day and age trump just about everything. I’m more inclined to put Dak in that category than Herbert.  Then there’s the tier before the elite group. That’s where I believe Young’s ceiling is. Which is fine. You better have a good team and a good coach around these types though.  I believe Bryce has a higher ceiling than Goff. Put Young on Detroit and that team has a higher ceiling. Would also have a lower floor but you’d take that.  Bryce doesn’t have many true ‘wtf’ moments. He definitely did his rookie year. Granted the bulk of his “supporting cast” and HC are out of the league now and were well on their way out when the arrived here.  Due to lack of physical traits and what made Bryce good at Bama this NFL thing was and still is going to take time with him. He’s adjusting to NFL defenses.  So sure, we’re kind of in a pickle. Do we keep Bryce and have something like the 10th best QB in the league paired with Canales whose ceiling is probably similar at his position or do we keep doing what we’ve been doing since 2017? This team has been an absolute mess since Tepper took over. He’s finally seeing some wins. I’m all for spending a day 3 pick every year on a QB with traits. But for the time being Young is definitely our best option in 2026 and it would be tough to imagine us having a better option at this point in 2027 as well I know how much the huddle loves charts but this wasn’t happening his rookie year. This chart is 2 weeks old but point remains. It’s also why I said Dalton would be useless against Buffalo. Bryce has done a real good job at avoiding sacks this year and then making something happen. Bryce is fully capable of giving you those 4-5 big plays you need from a QB a game. Those 4-5 big plays just look a lot different than the 4-5 big highlight type plays you get from those physically gifted QB’s
    • 5 games without a turnover, the defense has surprised me a lot this year. Second to last in sacks, yet still getting the job done, impressive. 
    • Dave “Uncanny” Canales His choices are often inexplicable, but work absurdly well about half the time.
×
×
  • Create New...