Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TNF: Ravens vs. Bengals


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This definitely sucks. Was shaking up to be a good game. Just another TNF game with key injuries. Seems like it happens every week. Burrow for the Bengals is huge. Andrews for the Ravens is big.

I don't see why they can't hire some nerd to fix the schedule so that when Byes start, you only play a Thursday game after your Bye week. So no one gets the short week. Surely a nerd could figure that math out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I don't see why they can't hire some nerd to fix the schedule so that when Byes start, you only play a Thursday game after your Bye week. So no one gets the short week. Surely a nerd could figure that math out.

If he was a Panther he'd be #4 on our all-time receiving yardage list and #5 in the all-time receiving TDs list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This definitely sucks. Was shaking up to be a good game. Just another TNF game with key injuries. Seems like it happens every week. Burrow for the Bengals is huge. Andrews for the Ravens is big.

fuging bullshit.  The first 4 legs of my parlay hit. Just needed another td pass from burrow.  Never fails

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...