Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is loosing Peppers going to be that bad?


rmoneyg35

Recommended Posts

Ok I've noticed everyone freaking out about us loosing Julius Peppers but is him leaving going to be that bad? I dont think people realize some of the positives that will come from him leaving. Dont get me wrong Peppers is one if not the best defensive ends in the NFL but his salary is too high. We have three other good defensive ends, atleast in my opinion. Brown could end up being a stud. He played well considering his playing time, and we dont always give rookies a bunch of playing time. With the money we save we could get a good not great defensive end and even get that wide reciever we always wanted. Think about pastteams that have lost key players and yet be more succesful. Now remember Johnson is starter material, Brayton is our other starter and Brown has potential, If we loose Peppers we could use more subs on the Defensive line and since we already have a lot of depth at defensive tackle and possibly we could convert one of them to a end, maybe. I dont know the upcoming free agents we could get but we always have players we can trade. Osi Umenyiora wants out of NYG and I think he will be a great addition. Correct me if Im wrong but Peppers is just one player, for his price we could have two really good players. What would you prefer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a good discussion point, but its been brought up a lot on this forum. An appreciated courtesy is to check for related threads on this subject before creating a new thread on it. Please do that in the future. Not a big deal, just thought I'm mention it, because the forum will work better for all of us if we take the time to put our thoughts where they are shared with others(where they belong).

Yes, Peppers makes too much money.

Yes, we should let him go, knowing his salary could be used in multiple positions.

BUT, it doesn't apply in an uncapped year. The money alone is not prohibitive the Panthers, its the cap restriction. So the question is, how imminent is an uncapped year in the NFL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not everyone on this board thinks losing Peppers is a bad thing, (I do).

Just b/c you have extra money, does not mean players will necessarily sign here.

Our defense will drop a notch without Peppers.

Again, a post that could have been put in the dozen other threads. But hey, at least you know people read it by starting a new one (or at least a sentence or two).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, we will see if he gets the tag starting on the 11th, but I doubt it, and no player is worth 20 mill a year, hell 16 mill for that matter. Then he may get offered a contract.....only time will tell, if he'd sign for 12.5 a year w/incentives...sure, love to see him stay, but any higher than that.....nope, thanks for the memories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...