Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Mock Drafts


pantherj
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Crixtala said:

The deeper I get into this, the less I think he does. I'm assuming most are thinking he'd be a Burns replacement and he's the best listed edge available when we start picking, but I think your assessment is correct, he seems more of a 4-3 edge

The last two I've done skipping over RobinsonPFN_Draft_result_1710598673427.thumb.png.7677c9a05225244dcf1e8d1ca3162415.pngPFN_Draft_result_1710687317393.thumb.png.eff5f3b65d8f119df757ed0da6a0c69a.png

I’m on the Sweat bandwagon as well, would be a spectacular front three

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of like this one. Could be three starters right out of the gate with those first three... possibly 4 if we don't get Clowney or Young.

Started thinking also about continuing to to beef up that OL. Got a good swing tackle and another solid OG, both show a lot of versatility.

Screenshot_20240317_204828_Firefox.thumb.jpg.31c572a615559ff536b77cfe8df04d25.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...