Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Even With the Win Today's attendance


BY9Franchise
 Share

Recommended Posts

when we get in field goal range, we play conservative--for the FG.  Good teams go for the the throat and attempt these things called "touchdowns."  In Charlotte, "touchdowns" are as rare as drop kicks or safeties. 

The players on this team are poorly coached--finding out who to keep and who to dump is going to be the real test of the next GM. 

Derrick Brown, as I have been saying, is the best player on the team--not even close.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

when we get in field goal range, we play conservative--for the FG.  Good teams go for the the throat and attempt these things called "touchdowns."  In Charlotte, "touchdowns" are as rare as drop kicks or safeties. 

The players on this team are poorly coached--finding out who to keep and who to dump is going to be the real test of the next GM. 

Derrick Brown, as I have been saying, is the best player on the team--not even close.

I was curious why they didn’t try to score a TD. I never like gambling on a kicker. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

when we get in field goal range, we play conservative--for the FG.  Good teams go for the the throat and attempt these things called "touchdowns."  In Charlotte, "touchdowns" are as rare as drop kicks or safeties. 

The players on this team are poorly coached--finding out who to keep and who to dump is going to be the real test of the next GM. 

Derrick Brown, as I have been saying, is the best player on the team--not even close.

 

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

I was curious why they didn’t try to score a TD. I never like gambling on a kicker. 


Had the Panthers gone for a TD and scored, they would have been up 12-7, contingent on the outcome of the two-point conversion. If they miss the conversion, an Atlanta TD wins it outright.

Up until Ridder’s INT, Atlanta moved the ball with ease the drive before the GWD. With 1st and Goal at the 1 yard line with 1:41 left, you have to keep the ball out of Atlanta’s hands at that point. You simply do not give the Falcons the ball with the chance to win/tie. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

when we get in field goal range, we play conservative--for the FG.  Good teams go for the the throat and attempt these things called "touchdowns."  In Charlotte, "touchdowns" are as rare as drop kicks or safeties. 

The players on this team are poorly coached--finding out who to keep and who to dump is going to be the real test of the next GM. 

Derrick Brown, as I have been saying, is the best player on the team--not even close.

Playing for the FG was the smart move. Especially for a terrible short yardage team. The only baffling play late was why the Falcons didn't just let Chuba score. He was dumb enough that he was trying to score and the Falcons were dumb enough to stop him at the goal line. If they let him score they're receiving a kickoff with a little under two minutes in the clock needing a TD to tie or win the game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

when we get in field goal range, we play conservative--for the FG.  Good teams go for the the throat and attempt these things called "touchdowns."  In Charlotte, "touchdowns" are as rare as drop kicks or safeties. 

The players on this team are poorly coached--finding out who to keep and who to dump is going to be the real test of the next GM. 

Derrick Brown, as I have been saying, is the best player on the team--not even close.

I felt just the opposite last week.  We had it inside at the three, the run game was working, and we dropped back to pass twice and went backwards.  Should have been more conservative.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

 


Had the Panthers gone for a TD and scored, they would have been up 12-7, contingent on the outcome of the two-point conversion. If they miss the conversion, an Atlanta TD wins it outright.

Up until Ridder’s INT, Atlanta moved the ball with ease the drive before the GWD. With 1st and Goal at the 1 yard line with 1:41 left, you have to keep the ball out of Atlanta’s hands at that point. You simply do not give the Falcons the ball with the chance to win/tie. 

I see the strategy at the end of the game, but earlier, when there were inside the 10, I thought they played it safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No it wasn't. If the weather was poo and it was two contenders in the field people would've still shown up to see it.

If it was sunny and 60 there would have been 4x the amount of people there at least. Might have been falcons fans but you are bonkers if you don’t think the weather was a huge deterrent today. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Playing for the FG was the smart move. Especially for a terrible short yardage team. The only baffling play late was why the Falcons didn't just let Chuba score. He was dumb enough that he was trying to score and the Falcons were dumb enough to stop him at the goal line. If they let him score they're receiving a kickoff with a little under two minutes in the clock needing a TD to tie or win the game.

It was, but I was thinking more in terms of the pattern they have exhibited in the past and earlier in the game.  I don't think I said specifically during the last drive--but instead of taking knees, I guess it is more risky to run Hubbard up the gut with both arms around the ball?  They might have let him score--I dunno

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Playing for the FG was the smart move. Especially for a terrible short yardage team. The only baffling play late was why the Falcons didn't just let Chuba score. He was dumb enough that he was trying to score and the Falcons were dumb enough to stop him at the goal line. If they let him score they're receiving a kickoff with a little under two minutes in the clock needing a TD to tie or win the game.

Yup, it set up to play out just as we needed.  There was zero need to give the ball back to the Falcons.  As well as our D played today all it would have taken is a busted coverage or a PI on a deep ball to get them in scoring range if we got the TD.  Yes, FGs are boring (former FG kicker speaking) but when you are dealt a winning hand, just don't fug it up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I felt just the opposite last week.  We had it inside at the three, the run game was working, and we dropped back to pass twice and went backwards.  Should have been more conservative.  

We do seem to abandon what is working.  Personally, I was excited about this staff based on the preseason hype.  I can wait to see all of them--except Evero--gone.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

If it was sunny and 60 there would have been 4x the amount of people there at least. Might have been falcons fans but you are bonkers if you don’t think the weather was a huge deterrent today. 

I was at a packed BOA stadium versus the Saints in monsoon like conditions years ago.  Rain hindered the crowd today, but it wasn't going to be close to a respectable attendance even without the rain.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of you misread my post--I was not talking about the end of the game--that was the right play--but earlier, on third down, I think we played to conservatively and took the FG--I wanted to see a pass in the end zone--maybe they are protecting Young--but I was not sure making the score 7-6 was smart--it turned out Okay, but if we had not had that game winning drive, many of us would be speculating that decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...