Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cardinals will not franchise Karlos Dansby


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

@Adam_Schefter:

No big surprise, but Cardinals will not franchise LB Karlos Dansby for 3rd straight year. He will be allowed to test free-agent market.

the past 2 years the Cardinals couldn't strike a deal with Dansby, so this year they will part ways with him. too bad hes not a DE. But hes a stud LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pretty much thought this was a no brainer. If you tag a player three straight years, the 3rd year the player makes an average of the top 5 of any position. Dude would have been making QB money at LB. No way of happening, not even on the Raiders.

shhhhhh now we both know thats not true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea... ummm.... i dont see the benefit of having a beefy LB corp in this age of the NFL when the pass is so dominant, i would rather have 3 sick nasty DB's than 3 sick nasty LB, think about it.

Having 3 sick nasty players at any position will be an advantage, the game is too balanced to really say what will work out the best.

Our LBs aren't what you would call beefy, both are undersized. Do you think we would have had such a great pass D without them?

I like a strong front 7 before the secondary, DBs can't tackle what a crap front 7 let's through and they can't cover a QB the front 7 never gets too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...