Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2010 Franchised Players--Add Ryan Pickett


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

@Adam_Schefter:

Green Bay Packers placed their franchise tag on DT Ryan Pickett. The DT franchise tag is $7 million. Pickett not going anywhere.

this free agent class is getting smaller by the day.

heres an updated list from profootballtalk.com:

Patriots: NT Vince Wilfork (franchise).

Steelers: NT Casey Hampton (franchise), K Jeff Reed (transition).

Raiders: DE Richard Seymour (francise).

Packers: NT Ryan Pickett (franchise).

Seahawks: K Olindo Mare (franchise).

49ers: NT Aubrayo Franklin (franchise).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because we need big money free agents, and Hurney is so terrible at finding bang for your buck talent in free agency.

Oh wait.

The LAST thing we need is big money free agents. They seldom have the impact on the field that fans expect....just look at Dallas, Washington, and Oakland as prime examples.

You lock up you young players and find complimentary pieces to your team.

Fans want to see the flashy signings, but they are not the way to go....especially in this WEAK free agent class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The LAST thing we need is big money free agents. They seldom have the impact on the field that fans expect....just look at Dallas, Washington, and Oakland as prime examples.

You lock up you young players and find complimentary pieces to your team.

Fans want to see the flashy signings, but they are not the way to go....especially in this WEAK free agent class.

just looking in our own division......the Saints adding Sharper last season and the Falcons the year before with Turner were probably both the moves that put them in the playoffs the year after they signed them.

Losing top tier talent over several years and hoping to replace it through the draft isn't a solution imo, we need a healthy mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The LAST thing we need is big money free agents. They seldom have the impact on the field that fans expect....just look at Dallas, Washington, and Oakland as prime examples.

You lock up you young players and find complimentary pieces to your team.

Fans want to see the flashy signings, but they are not the way to go....especially in this WEAK free agent class.

We dont need to break the bank but a competent WR would do wonders for our Offense. Its clear that Drafting one is not gonna happen for this team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...