Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assistant Coach Chatter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, magnus said:

Goodwin and Gilbert are not bad. They're good technicians.

Ideally we'd have guys who weren't 32nd in rushing though? 

Goodwin succeeded Russ Grimm in Pittsburgh, didn't he?

Seems to have had a long association with Bruce Arians that I imagine started there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not looking for greatness out of our assistant coaches anymore. These are NFL coaches-- not college guys like Rhule, and not vaunted up and comers like Reich. Let's just hire some solid to average coaches and let our young HC build something with guys who know him.

 

Keep the defensive staff intact and we're good.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Goodwin succeeded Russ Grimm in Pittsburgh, didn't he?

Seems to have had a long association with Bruce Arians that I imagine started there.

Yep. Arians moved up from WR and Grimm left.  To be fair Goodwin is listed as a third tier assistant in 07-09, not line coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ship said:

I'm not looking for greatness out of our assistant coaches anymore. These are NFL coaches-- not college guys like Rhule, and not vaunted up and comers like Reich. Let's just hire some solid to average coaches and let our young HC build something with guys who know him.

 

Keep the defensive staff intact and we're good.

Great point

Last year we had too many assistant coaches who all had HC aspirations and each wanted to be given the credit for fixing the Panthers and developing Byce Young. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, magnus said:

I posted Frazier was on the team site still, at 7:30, and a few minutes later he was fired... Odd

John Lilly, Evero, and the defense are still there, with Canales 

I think speculation was Nate Carroll was gonna take the QB coach spot.

Haven't seen as much former Seahawk influence as some expected so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it speaks volumes for how well Dave Canales was thought of in Tampa by seeing him be able to bring some of these solid veteran coaches with him. They must know that without Canales Todd Bowles will go back to being on the hot seat like he was before the start of last season. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brother you've been WR driven for going on almost two decades now.  No need for us to discuss further.
    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
×
×
  • Create New...