Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

March 9th Kemo bonus


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

we won't have to re-sign him. he'll be under contract for 2010 regardless. the option is if we decide to continue our relationship with him beyond that.

3/11/2006: Signed a five-year, $23 million contract. The deal includes $8 million guaranteed. If Kemoeatu's 2010 option bonus is not exercised, his contract will expire after the 2010 season.

2009: $2 million (+ $1.9 million in guaranteed bonuses),

2010: $750,000 (+ $9.3 million option bonus due in March),

2011: $1.485 million (Voidable Years),

2012: $2.115 million,

2013: $2.745 million,

2014: $3.375 million,

2015: Free Agent

linkif we don't exercise the option then we are on the hook for $750k one way or the other. might as well keep him around and see if he recovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a $9.3 million option bonus due in early March which would extend his contract through 2014, but no one anticipated that ever being picked up. It was written into his deal last offseason to save some salary cap room. When that tab isn’t picked up (according to contract documents obtained by The Herald), he’ll be due a $1.7 million non-exercise bonus and a base salary of $2.6 million for next season, essentially what he’d have made before...

Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think depending on how good a push he can get from that injury he has. That will tell us wheather he will stay are not. It all comes down to how much push up from he can get on the sleds in mini camp and all. I hope he has healed fine to where he can come back and play again this coming year. But it is a concern at this point to wheather are not that injury is going to heal properly to allow him to keep doing his job up front on sundays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we won't have to re-sign him. he'll be under contract for 2010 regardless. the option is if we decide to continue our relationship with him beyond that.

linkif we don't exercise the option then we are on the hook for $750k one way or the other. might as well keep him around and see if he recovers.

I know that.But he has a roster bonus due march 9th for 1.7mill.I am saying if we cut him so he wont get that.do you think we will re-sign him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that.But he has a roster bonus due march 9th for 1.7mill.I am saying if we cut him so he wont get that.do you think we will re-sign him

Are you asking if he is resigned (as in, next year) will they have to pay that bonus?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that.But he has a roster bonus due march 9th for 1.7mill.I am saying if we cut him so he wont get that.do you think we will re-sign him

I think he gets cut before he's owed the roster bonus if he hasn't made some serious improvement with his recovery from the injury. If the do cut him, I doubt they would sign him back after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any chance of a trade?

Most of the tagged guys ended up being DT's especially from 3-4 defenses.

Not many left out there in the FA pool.

I think if Kemo was not coming off injury then a low pick.But no team going to give us anything for him now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that.But he has a roster bonus due march 9th for 1.7mill.I am saying if we cut him so he wont get that.do you think we will re-sign him
i'd be surprised if we could re-sign him. there are a lot of teams that want/need a big NT. as bad as we think he might be, he's still going to be attractive to someone. he isn't some scrub. he's a big body that can clog up the middle. that makes life easier for a lot of other players. he'll be an attractive option for quite a few teams.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now, XL is probably outside the top 100 NFL WR's. That is just not going to cut it.  He certainly could turn it around but our track record in this area is very well established. When our WR's bust, boy do they bust. XL looks exactly like so many of those cases.  XL has been the 9th most productive WR in that 2024 class and is likely to slip to 10th very soon as one of the guys who missed a large chunk of last season is about to pass him(Pearsall) in career production. That's not great for the 7th overall WR picked. It's a disappointment, without question. Even a the guy getting healthy scratches has still outperformed him so far.  And, for the record, it was a very, very productive WR class so far.
    • 4th read? On a playaction? Do you not watch the ALL 22? There were 4 receivers on that play. Only 2 went beyond 2 yards on a 10 yard crossing route in front of a single high safety. The TE stayed in to block before releasing on a drag route and was never a read. Coker was motioned to the right to pull a defender to the sideline. This was a clear flat route and hot if the defender came on a blitz. The RB stayed in to block on the right side. Coming out of the playaction Bryce spots the defender for a possible blitz and then goes to his primary receiver on his left. The only receiver on the left coming out of the playaction was TMac. He clearly follows TMac to the cross in front of the safety and looks off the safety to the left. This is not a read to XL. It's looking off the safety. He swings his vision back to his primary in TMac and throws the ball to the numbers (20) 10 yards over the head of the DB when TMac reaches the right hashes near the 30 yard line before TMac even makes a cut. Bryce was never leading or throwing to the receiver. He was throwing to a spot based on the movement of 2 defenders. It was up to TMac to make this play happen with perfect timing, release, sell and cut on his route. Give credit to the play design. The defense is playing that route as a sideline route and TMac makes it happen with his body position and control as he cuts/drifts 10 yards up field to the spot he knew it was going to before the play. If that were a 4th progression read out of a playaction, you'd see 4 hitch steps and the receiver would have been led to the sideline as TMac would have never known the ball was going to be thrown 10 yards over the DBs head on a 10 yard cross to the sideline. You can also tell this is the desgin as Bryce sets to the left out of the playaction with XL on his right before the cross. Then he takes 3 bounce steps to move with the pocket as XL is late to the cross. His first hitch step is to the right after TMac crosses, which is followed by an immediate throw before a cut is made by TMac. TMac was the only receiver to the left on Bryce's set, and he was one of 2 WRs to the right on Bryce's first and only hitch step. Give TMac and the play design a bulk of the credit. Bryce did well, but he didn't sell the playaction or a possible pass to XL very well. He did do very well at throwing to a predetermined spot on the field after TMac set up that crossing route perfectly with XL and Sanders both late on developing their routes. Did you catch all that on the play? For some reason, you think there were 4 progressions out of play action with the defense pressing, Bryce setting his hips to the left with all 3 receivers on the right side of what you think was his 4th option as the only receiver on the left at the snap, and only 1 hitch step to the right after TMac waits for XL to cross left. Why would you think a QB would set their hips to the left when their first 3 progressions are on the right side of the field?
    • Agreed, however there are many QBs that don't place it perfectly.  
×
×
  • Create New...