Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurst cut


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, 45catfan said:

It was the first attempt to roll with someone other than Thomas.  Yes, many of us were happy.  Hurst got cut and still was better than Thomas. 

Hey, trust me, Ik Thomas sucks and was overpaid. The solution was not to pay another booty TE even more money. Especially when tremble was just drafted in the 3rd 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I dont even remember that many people going crazy excited over his signing in all honesty

Maybe it’s bc I’ve thought hurts sucked for years but everyone seemed stoked we were getting him. 0 talent eval just “omg its not Ian Thomas !”

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthers8969 said:

Hey, trust me, Ik Thomas sucks and was overpaid. The solution was not to pay another booty TE even more money. Especially when tremble was just drafted in the 3rd 

 

1 hour ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I dont even remember that many people going crazy excited over his signing in all honesty

Bump the hurst signing thread, I hated it and wanted Schultz.

But please dont bumped anything with me speaking about miles sanders......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Panthers8969 said:

Maybe it’s bc I’ve thought hurts sucked for years but everyone seemed stoked we were getting him. 0 talent eval just “omg its not Ian Thomas !”

I think everyone was relieved there was a chance of anything besides Ian Thomas like you said. It's that old Ian Thomas PTSD kicking in. I have some of it myself as well. I would probably get excited about any TE signing at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I think everyone was relieved there was a chance of anything besides Ian Thomas like you said. It's that old Ian Thomas PTSD kicking in. I have some of it myself as well. I would probably get excited about any TE signing at this point.

Yeah but we had Tommy T on the roster? It usually takes TEs time to develop and has historically been one of the slower developing positions. Why hinder TT’s development further by overpaying a JAG? Just cause? I’d rather have bad TEs for cheap than bad TEs for real $

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a question.  Could Coby White be a solid replacement for Ball? Seems he could be an upgrade. Seems he played well in replacement of Ball.  I normally get the highlights and don't get to see any games but I liked when White was on on the court. 
    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
×
×
  • Create New...