Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Leafs 6pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

Toronto is gonna be no joke. We played the worst hockey we have in a long time against them in Toronto. I want to see a very conservative game tonight, we will create scoring chances especially with our additions throughout the game. We don’t always need to be trying for the flashy play or nice shot. Value puck possession and protect the blue lines.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a very physical and fast-paced game against Edmonton last night. A quick turn-around and back-to-back for Toronto. Yes, the Canes will see Woll (10-7-1) tonite. His save % is just above 90 and he and the Leafs both allow about 3 goals per game.

I'll admit I don't have a good feeling about this unless the Canes play a different game than they did against Washington.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

It was a very physical and fast-paced game against Edmonton last night. A quick turn-around and back-to-back for Toronto. Yes, the Canes will see Woll (10-7-1) tonite. His save % is just above 90 and he and the Leafs both allow about 3 goals per game.

I'll admit I don't have a good feeling about this unless the Canes play a different game than they did against Washington.

If we don’t do what we did in Toronto I think we’ll be ok. Odd man rushes and neutral zone giveaways need to be curtailed.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Just realized we had 6 games in 9 days after the caps. 7 games in 11 days now. The canes were tired Friday and still got a point. I love this team and should be well rested for today. I’m liking us bigtime tonight. 

No morning skate. Expect a slow start. 
 

And yes the league absolutely fugged us this month. Meanwhile the rags get 2.5 days off and no more back to backs. We have one more back to back but do have a 4 day and a 2 day off. Whereas the rags play every other day from tuesday on out. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

No morning skate. Expect a slow start. 
 

And yes the league absolutely fugged us this month. Meanwhile the rags get 2.5 days off and no more back to backs. We have one more back to back but do have a 4 day and a 2 day off. Whereas the rags play every other day from tuesday on out. 

We will still walk them down. Mark my words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Chief_Chokeaho said:

I wonder where Fast even fits moving forward? 
 

Guentz - Aho - Jarvis

Necas - Kuz - Svech

Martinook - Staal - Turbo

KK? - Drury - Noesen

I actually really like that 4th line. Crazy depth. 

Yes. Playing without fast is suicide in the playoffs. He is by far still the grindiest grinder we have and he’s crucial to the PK. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Personally, in the playoffs I’d go:

Guentzel - Aho - Jarvis

Svechnikov - Kuznetsov - Necas

Martinooo - Staal - Fast

Noesen - Kotkaniemi/Drury - Teravainen


Kotkaniemi and Drury can rotate and who knows how long Drury will even last. When the games get physical he usually gets hurt.

If Drury is centering a line I’d flip flop TT and Jarvis or even move Jarvis to Kuz and Necas to Drury. Both of those pairs have good chemistry. Can’t underrate that Finnish connection come playoff time man. 
 

That way if we need a boost in a series like Florida last time, we can push Jarvis up and create that flow change.

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...