Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Rags Round 2 Game 2 Tuesday 7PM


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, t96 said:

Lol yep apparently. Banned for 2 months — for what, I have absolutely no idea. I logged in today to see the ban and there is a PM notification but I can’t read it because of the ban. No warnings or anything before and I only ever posted in the canes board. Completely absurd but whatever. Literally only reason I was there vs the huddle was it has much more activity but seems like you boys here have resurrected the canes forum a bit in recent years.

Same thing happened to me I got banned for this post.... I'm like what (I was ironcladcane)  what exactly about this is ban worthy lol between that the fact the mods are anonymous losers.

Screenshot_20240507_091231_Gallery.jpg

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right there with Tripp on all of that. If Freddie doesn’t have a bounce back game I will be perturbed. 
 

FYI I haven’t listened to it yet but Tripp was on the 9AM ET time slot for those of you that have the SiriusXM app for the rewind. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

If we lose because of Freddie, I might be on board the fire Rod boat 

Nah, but Rod has been very open that he let's his position coaches take the reins on a lot of these decisions. If we goalie ourselves out of the playoffs once again, changes have to be made. Rod ain't going anywhere, though I wouldn't be surprised to see a bit of a house cleaning, with everyone's contracts expiring after the season ends.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Nah, but Rod has been very open that he let's his position coaches take the reins on a lot of these decisions. If we goalie ourselves out of the playoffs once again, changes have to be made. Rod ain't going anywhere, though I wouldn't be surprised to see a bit of a house cleaning, with everyone's contracts expiring after the season ends.

I prefer we just kick ass tonight and things are back to where they need to be. A Freddie shutout would be fuging tasty. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fred has had a half season of rest, and he's the guy. I think Rod learned from the Florida series, and in general. Rest for Bob last year was overrated. It mattered eventually, sure, but there can be both a better balance while still featuring the guy. And Fred is the guy. It's nice that Pyotr at this age already has playoff experience, but in my opinion, not starting him in game 4 was the ultimate sign that Rod is riding Fred until otherwise noted. And I think Fred has earned that in his time since his injury. I don't hate a better balance, but I think game 4 was the perfect time with no pressure to do it and the fact that we didn't spoke volumes.  His leash will inevitably be shorter with the struggles, but he's been solid overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Nah, but Rod has been very open that he let's his position coaches take the reins on a lot of these decisions. If we goalie ourselves out of the playoffs once again, changes have to be made. Rod ain't going anywhere, though I wouldn't be surprised to see a bit of a house cleaning, with everyone's contracts expiring after the season ends.

Let Jeff Daniel’s HC the wolves… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...