Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goodell: Stadium experience needs to be better than home


Dpantherman

Which is better??  

76 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is better??

    • Stadium Experience
      36
    • Home Experience
      40


Recommended Posts

Posted by Michael David Smith on March 28, 2010 9:42 AM ET

NFL TV ratings soared in 2009 while ticket sales were sluggish, which raises a question: Do fans prefer watching games at home to watching games in person?

As someone who has multiple high-definition televisions, DirecTV with the NFL Sunday Ticket Superfan package, a comfortable couch and a wife who brings me snacks, I don't particularly see going to a game as improving my football-watching experience.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell acknowledged at the annual league meetings that plenty of fans feel that way, although he stressed the importance of the in-stadium experience to the league's long-term health, and he insisted that the coziness of home can't match the thrill of the stadium.

"It may be more comfortable, but it's not more exciting," Goodell said, per the Florida Times-Union.

The Times-Union article is headlined, "Are broadcasts too good? Roger Goodell admits it's a concern as blackouts loom." It notes that among the Jacksonville Jaguars' problems in selling out their stadium is the fact that even if the Jaguars are blacked out eight Sundays a year, fans in Jacksonville can still have a great day of watching football from their living rooms, especially if they have DirecTV or a cable system that offers the RedZone Channel.

That's why Goodell says he's so concerned with making the experience of going to a game better.

"We as a league are focused on it, and it's one of our priorities," Goodell said. "Our challenge is to continue to make it exciting for people who come to our facility. And that comes from a lot of different perspectives. You start with fan conduct. We talk about making sure people feel safe and they have a positive experience when they come to our stadiums. You talk about how to entertain them when they come to our stadiums. We have to do more with technology."

At some stadiums, that technology will involve giving fans hand-held TVs showing the RedZone Channel. Just like they can watch at home.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/28/goodell-stadium-experience-needs-to-be-better-than-home/

What do you guys think?? I know theres nothing like the stadium experience. But we just got the HDTV and Direct TV. and Im ready for football season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some sports that are better being there and some that are better at home. If its the nhl or any kind of college type atmosphere I want to be there but the nfl is just better at home. Ticket prices are too high, its hard to really see what's going on, food and drinks are over priced, its a pain in the ass to get to and leave the stadium, you have to battle the elements etc... give me the home experience

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacob3-89

Stadium is like home to me.

But it is a bitch to leave the damn thing. I feel the need to tackle the other teams fans when they bump bye me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Goodell and the author of that story think people stay home because of TV quality, they're beyond stupid. Maybe the economy has a bit to do with it. I went to the Eagles game on opening day last season, knowing that there was a chance I was getting fired from my job. Had I known that I'd still be jobless 6 months later, I would have saved that 400 dollars and spent it elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 40 inch, full 1080p HD TV with all the extras and a giant leather couch that you you melt into like butter. It doesn't matter. I go to almost every game every year. Nothing is like going, especially with good seats. I wouldn't go with the crappiest tickets you can buy but anything better and I am there, most of the time by myself. It is something to enjoy.

My #1 thing about the stadium is the beer choices and the prices. That beer they sell is crap what would really enhance my stadium experience would be a Heineken. I would have to say that would be my only reason for wanting to stay home.

Bar experience usually sucks IMO, your keeping all the stadium morons without the exiting atmosphere. Bigger games are more fun in bars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter what I have at home, being AT the stadium is ALWAYs my first choice. There is nothing like being there on Sunday to me!! Even when its my wife's turn to use our tickets, I go to the stadium and scalp.

I think the real issue with empty seats at stadiums is many season ticket holders, etc arent really fans. They just have tickets so they can say so and be there when its a big game, etc. They are the ones who dont go many times due to weather, something else to do on Sunday, team not to good, rather stay home today. So the problem then does come down to "cost" because the fan like me who just loves being at the stadium for many the price to go is to high so then end up staying home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$6 per Miller lite or $25 for a case of Sam Adams. Hard plastic or Lay-z-boy. $4 one Hot dog or $4 for a pack of hot dogs. Standing in a long line to piss 1 foot away from a total stranger during halftime or pause the game to go to your own toilet and listen to wife bitch you didn't put the seat down.

I know the game atmosphere is something you can't get at home and I try to make a couple games a year, but I do love watching the game from my recliner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jaguars also aren't that good. A young mediocre franchise isn't exactly something that make people scream "I can't wait to eat excessively over-priced processed food and drink soda that cost considerably more than the gas I put in my car to get to this suckfest!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me home really is better. You don't have to deal with sweater vest people and its like sitting at the 50 yard line. I guess if I was super rich and could afford box seats with all my friends there it would be great but when people huff and puff about cheering and standing up its not worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jaguars also aren't that good. A young mediocre franchise isn't exactly something that make people scream "I can't wait to eat excessively over-priced processed food and drink soda that cost considerably more than the gas I put in my car to get to this suckfest!"

Throw in "that never has first round draft picks because they trade them away" and you describe another team....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...