Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Russell Okung on Dave Canales:


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, csx said:

Everyone is trying to get a great qb. If it was easy they wouldn't be called Suoermen.

Brady and Mahomes are 7 of the last 10. Brady was Superman? Huh?

Brady (and fwiw, most great qb's) was at his best under pressure.  He didn't get rattled, and was probably more accurate than earlier in the game.  IMO, that is what separates the adequate guys from the all time greats. In that regard, he was a Superman.   Same with Mahomes and Montana.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Brady (and fwiw, most great qb's) was at his best under pressure.  He didn't get rattled, and was probably more accurate than earlier in the game.  IMO, that is what separates the adequate guys from the all time greats. In that regard, he was a Superman.   Same with Mahomes and Montana.  

 

Was Brady dropped into the worst coached side in football with the worst oline and weapons? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, rayzor said:

i'd just like to say that winning a superbowl is an anomaly for any QB not named Tom Brady or Patrick Mahomes. 

there is no QB prototype that consistently wins championships.

QB doesn't win championships.

Winner goes to teams that can do their damn job and that's usually teams that are coached better.

Joe Montana as well...

Qbs definitely win championships

The 49ers clearly had the better team, yet the chiefs still won just this past season.

Yes there are some 1 off guys but most super bowl winners have had great QBs. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No saying he mostly sucks is saying that he doesn’t suck the minority of the time.   Like if he took 17 tests and had a couple of really good showings and a handful of pretty good scores sprinkled in among the typical sub par results.   Like a golfer who went out and shot an 89.  There will be some real nice shots sprinkled in there but at the end of the day it is still 89.    
    • It's worth mentioning... Game 1: Oct 11 in Raleigh. 4-3 OT win with a complete starting lineup. Game 2: Dec 13 in Philly. 4-3 SO win without Jaccob Slavin. Game 3: Dec 14 in Raleigh. 3-2 SO win with a complete starting lineup. Game 4: Apr 13 in Philly. 3-2 SO loss with the AHL roster.  Those early season games were no indication of the Canes team that finished the season. Miller and Ehlers were still trying to figure things out, Nikishin was still a work in progress and the Stankoven line was just another line. Make no mistake, the Canes team Philly will see is nothing close to what they saw at any point in the season. If the top line starts producing, Freddie stays hot and the blue line does what it does, this could be a sweep as well.   
    • He is an employee of the team and speaking on the team's official channel. They arent critical of anything ever.
×
×
  • Create New...