Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers vs Pats 7pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, strato said:

No one wants to watch horrible football. Especially when it’s your team making it bad football. There was like, ZERO payoff for us really.

It was Christmas morning last night, and even though we were pretty sure what to expect; we were getting socks like we do most Christmases, we had disappointment when we opened presents. Even the socks were crappy. 

It is Devil’s advocate time, time to bright side this poo: The strategy of playing your depth might actually be smart. Things happen in game situations that you don’t see in practices, all day. 

You find who you want to focus on right away, have more time to form your decisions, might be a more efficient way of looking at finalizing a roster.

And your starters stay healthy for the week of Jets scrimmages and will have the chance to gauge their progress. 

 

The current trend with only three preseason games instead of four is that the third is still the dress rehearsal for the starters. That means those fighting for roster spots aren't going to have the on-field time they used to have at the end of preseason to make their case. Yesterday was probably their best shot and suffice it to say, most aren't making the cut. Of course, that's going to be the case regardless because we can only keep 55. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Paa Langfart said:

Loved it when smitty made the comment about 2 minutes till the half  something to the effect -  " we got some great halftime highlights for you"  .  I about fell out of my chair laughing.

I missed that.  It really requires a lot of discipline to watch this offense.  In case we did not see enough "three and outs" last year, we are going to put in an undrafted, rookie, third string (for now) confused QB for over 3 quarters to trigger all kinds of nostalgic flashbacks, including unforced fumbles, pre-snap penalties, and my favorite, multiple dropped passes by high-paid professional athletes whose only job is to catch the football when it is thrown to them.  As bad as it made me feel, at least we could see them laughing about it on the sidelines.  I admire Canales positivity, but it is time to make some moves. 

Leota played a good game---held the edge and pressured the passer.  Matthews caught about 3 balls and he was pumped and focused while everyone else seemed numb. I'd keep Coker if cuts were tomorrow and I might cut TMJ.   Nobody should be paid to suck legally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

It didn't require 3.5 quarters to figure that out.  That was brutal.

If I’m guessing, maybe they wanted to see him against the Pats backups and 3rd stringers?? Plus Luton was signed a few days ago. Probably still learning the playbook. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If I’m guessing, maybe they wanted to see him against the Pats backups and 3rd stringers?? Plus Luton was signed a few days ago. Probably still learning the playbook. 

He's just the cannon fodder.  They decided to shelter Bryce and Andy is hurt.  There's no evaluation going on at the QB position here.  They made no attempt to make that position better.  He was a warm body to play the game last night.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He's just the cannon fodder.  They decided to shelter Bryce and Andy is hurt.  There's no evaluation going on at the QB position here.  They made no attempt to make that position better.  He was a warm body to play the game last night.

I mean no starters played aside from Dane Jackson and maybe DJ Johnson? Are we sheltering AT, Johnson, Chuba, Clowney, Horn, Brown and all of the other starters (I think it was over 30) that sat out? If we played all our starters but Bryce then maybe that argument makes more sense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I mean no starters played aside from Dane Jackson and maybe DJ Johnson? Are we sheltering AT, Johnson, Chuba, Clowney, Horn, Brown and all of the other starters (I think it was over 30) that sat out? If we played all our starters but Bryce then maybe that argument makes more sense.

So it comes out earlier in the week that Bryce won't play, and then on game day we find out its 30 people?  If that was the case, why not say that earlier in the week?  Why not say well actually most of the starters won't play week 1, so its not special for Bryce.  That wasn't brought up at all?  Are we using deception in the preseason?  Wouldn't you want to match the other team a little bit, so you can get something productive out of the game?  It feels like they decided to hold everyone out because they were scared of how bad the performance would be.  This is just an odd situation, and indicative of an inexperienced coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

So it comes out earlier in the week that Bryce won't play, and then on game day we find out its 30 people?  If that was the case, why not say that earlier in the week?  Why not say well actually most of the starters won't play week 1, so its not special for Bryce.  That wasn't brought up at all?  Are we using deception in the preseason?  Wouldn't you want to match the other team a little bit, so you can get something productive out of the game?  It feels like they decided to hold everyone out because they were scared of how bad the performance would be.  This is just an odd situation, and indicative of an inexperienced coach.

He mentioned counting on certain guys and limiting injuries.  That's saying 2 things.  One the starters probably aren't playing and two our depth is not very good.  There really isn't much deception knowing QB1 won't play and QB2 is hurt.  QB3 was going to play most of this game and it was no secret.  Imagine Plummer throwing a hospital ball for Johnson in this game and him getting hurt.  I'm hoping/guessing we see the starters for some series in game 3 when the OL is a little more stable and needing time to gel.  

I mean we all know Bryce is going to play this year.  It doesn't make sense for DC to be scared to play him in a preseason game because he knows how bad he will look.  Everyone is going to see him during the regular season when defenses will play all of their starters and have 100%% of their playbook opened up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Also if its about evaluation.  Why are we so concerned with evaluating the worst guys on the worst roster in the NFL?  So much that we don't find it useful to practice with our actual players.

To see if they make the team or get replaced/cut when teams start trimming down their roster.  A lot of the guys last night didn't play much last year or weren't on the roster.  He seems to be concerned about out depth and rightfully so. Here is how he answered it.  The bad news is (maybe it's just coach speak) he is talking about going over the film with Plummer like we are keeping him around...

Q: Dave, obviously, not playing your starters was a conscious decision. How do you evaluate the game as a whole knowing you kind of went in shorthanded that way?

DC: Oh, I think just valuable reps, right? For these guys, the opportunity to play this many snaps in a preseason game for the guys that were up for this game, it's invaluable. Jack Plummer getting out there; he had a rough night but it was just such – it's his first NFL game, and hopefully, we'll get to the point where we can show him the film and just kind of show him, 'Hey man, trust your preparation, trust your timing from practice,' and just to stay composed as the game goes along. He was able to put a good drive together, but then we had the grounding penalty that kind of kicked us out of that advantageous field position that we had. So, I just love the opportunity it gives for a lot of the guys for us to evaluate them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...