Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think UGA is going to comeback and win this one.

GT didn’t capitalize enough in the first half.  GT QB looks to be slowing down/hurt and they are going to have to let fans play DB at some point.  

UGA has also been a second half team multiple times this year.  Exploded vs Clemson, Florida, etc in the 2nd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think UGA is going to comeback and win this one.

GT didn’t capitalize enough in the first half.  GT QB looks to be slowing down/hurt and they are going to have to let fans play DB at some point.  

UGA has also been a second half team multiple times this year.  Exploded vs Clemson, Florida, etc in the 2nd

As lopsided as the stat sheet was GT really should've built a bigger cushion. They completely dominated that half even more than the 17-0 scoreboard reflected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Everyone is chasing points early these days.  They call it analytics.  I call bologna. 

When you're down 17 you need three scores no matter how you slice it. Now you need a TD, two points conversion, and a FG just to tie. Now you kinda have to start chasing points.

GT should go for this 4th and 3ish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He doesn't need to play in 2025. And maybe not 2026 either from what I've read. This is but one peer-reviewed selection: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5226931/     Regarding your first question... "The optimal timing of ACLR is an important clinical decision that affects patient outcomes significantly. Even though there is no consensus in the literature, there are some trends regarding timing of ACLR. Various authors suggest that ACLR be performed at least 3 weeks after injury in order to avoid arthrofibrosis. More important than time alone, objective criteria including perioperative swelling, edema, hyperthermia, and ROM are important indicators of when surgery should be performed." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4004131/#:~:text=The optimal timing of ACLR is an important clinical decision,in order to avoid arthrofibrosis.  
    • Not sure I would be so sure they feel worse than us - their QB was better than Bryce at in the first season, they got DJ Moore, and 2 more high caliber draft picks.  We had to give up basically our entire defense this season indirectly to make that happen and we still have no true #1 WR.  Not saying I would rather have Caleb over Bryce at this point - but I would rather have their team situation and draft picks hands down.
    • A lot of people think this draft is weak at QB--I think, after the first five picks of the first round, there are a ton of developmental QBs who could develop into the role--here is the psychology behind it--Bryce becomes the mentor--you can learn as much by teaching others than by being taught.   It also makes him a true leader.  But I think there are a few QB in this draft that might not be ready now, but in 2 years, could be NFL starting QBs--Howard, Rourke, Ewers, Milroe, Dart, etc.  Talk about a cheaper backup and one that could evolve into trade capital--or if Bryce can't find consistency-his replacement.  Round 3 will have some of these qbs--maybe early day 3.
×
×
  • Create New...