Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

SMU doesn’t want to play because they know a pissed off Clemson team is going to spank them.

I mean, Clemson is pissed.  They are the most talented team probably SMU has seen this year.  And for whatever experience gets you.....it's their 8th title game in the last 10 years.  And say what you want about Dabo (I get the outsider dislike), but in house, Dabo Swinney is one heck of a motivator.  And he is really is trying to turn on his why not us narrative pretty strong.  Fueling the team off the hate. 

I think the game likely comes down to this, will Dabo (the over loyal coach)......put Mafah on the bench? Or a significantly limited role.   Dude is hurt.  He wouldn't take him off the field vs SC.  A hurt power RB is just a slow RB.  But the last ACC title game is also where he was willing to finally put DJU down in the name of winning at the end. 

I like Clemson's odds much better this week than last.  But in fairness, I still haven't watched a SMU game, just highlights.  So I really don't know what they are bringing to the table. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

SMU doesn’t want to play because they know a pissed off Clemson team is going to spank them.

They don't want to play because they have nothing to gain and everything to lose. They're in the exact same spot as ND without the brand name. They've played a soft schedule and have one win over a ranked team but unlike ND their one loss is actually to a decent top 20 team. 

SMU's resume is every bit as strong as ND's but ND is sitting very comfortably at #4 probably looking at a first round bye while SMU is probably playing for their playoff lives. It's fuged up. They really need to force ND into a conference if they want to be eligible for the playoffs. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think instead of teams fixating on would scheduling X over Y be the difference maker......just realize that won't matter in the end.  What will matter, is who is close to you and what that does for national viewership interest. 

Bama has a huge fanbase and they have the perfect compliment to that.  Lots of haters.  So they get love and hate watching.  I think even if Clemson belonged, let's say they beat SC and Miami won.  Think they would have had strong at large odds because they have a good fanbase.....and they get the added hate watching. 

So maybe a SEC would want to throw comical money at Deion Sanders to try to woo him to be PR guy who dabbles as HC. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think instead of teams fixating on would scheduling X over Y be the difference maker......just realize that won't matter in the end.  What will matter, is who is close to you and what that does for national viewership interest. 

Bama has a huge fanbase and they have the perfect compliment to that.  Lots of haters.  So they get love and hate watching.  I think even if Clemson belonged, let's say they beat SC and Miami won.  Think they would have had strong at large odds because they have a good fanbase.....and they get the added hate watching. 

So maybe a SEC would want to throw comical money at Deion Sanders to try to woo him to be PR guy who dabbles as HC. 

Who cares about Clemson besides the Carolina's? They are not some Nat'l program like the Alabama/Georgia/Ohio State. Those schools have real tradition. Clemson is not in that kind of conversation in terms of viewership.

 

Also why would Deion go to the SEC. He sitting perfect at Colorado in a conference that he could dominate for the next decade or however long he wants to coach. Only way I think he leaves Colorado is if they massively underpay him compared to what a school in the SEC would pay him. 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would almost guarantee that Clemson is a top 10 team when it comes to average television ratings. Sports fandom is very much what have you one for me lately and Clemson has been one of the top teams in the country over the last decade. Honestly, there was a stretch of a few years when they were THE top team in the country.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CRA said:

But I still don’t expect it going to portal kids. 

He's going to have no choice this year. The recruiting class was so small once he lost the 4-5 decommitments. Dabo will have to get portal kids to have depth. I think he grabs a RB, CB and DE. They've also already been rumored to a portal punter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Who cares about Clemson besides the Carolina's? They are not some Nat'l program like the Alabama/Georgia/Ohio State. Those schools have real tradition. Clemson is not in that kind of conversation in terms of viewership.

 

Also why would Deion go to the SEC. He sitting perfect at Colorado in a conference that he could dominate for the next decade or however long he wants to coach. Only way I think he leaves Colorado is if they massively underpay him compared to what a school in the SEC would pay him. 

 

 

Clemson has been the 2nd best team in the CFP era.  An ACC school.  They are a national program.    You debate if they can stay there or not.  I can handle the argument they are soon to fall out. No one besides grandpa cares about what happened in the 80s or 90s or whatever tradition you want to toot about.   My kid isn't turning on Notre Dame on NBC.   Present day TV eyeballs don't care.  And it's not about comparing Clemson to Bama in terms of viewership.  It's about the edge they would have on teams right beneath that Bama tier.  Which totally would be relevant in a 12 team CFP environment. 

Clemson not only has a good fanbase...but unlike say a South Carolina team, Clemson has real nationwide hate. Love it or hate, they have legit personality.   Which is basically the point.  And it's unique.   It's why SEC talking head Paul Finnebaum has spent the last decade fixated on them.  And Dabo Swinney is 100% a key driver of that relevance/interest/added hate component.  Lose him and it changes Clemson in many ways.  They immediately become irrelevant IMO in the national convo.  

I don't think Deion continues coaching.   We have done this dance.  It was about his son and nothing else.  Latest example was that last Heisman pitch they made to the voters.  HeisMEN and his son prioritized first over Hunter.  I'm just saying he would be a Dabo on steroids.  So you take a random SEC/Big10 school A and random school B and make them equal.  If Deion is coaching one of those, the CFP is going to put them in.  So that matters more than slight scheduling tinkering or SOS or whatever.  It's all a money game in the end.  It's a show in the end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TEClemson53 said:

He's going to have no choice this year. The recruiting class was so small once he lost the 4-5 decommitments. Dabo will have to get portal kids to have depth. I think he grabs a RB, CB and DE. They've also already been rumored to a portal punter.

Oh, I think he might technically use it.  I just don't see him using it in the manner the rest of the field will.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CRA said:

Clemson has been the 2nd best team in the CFP era.  An ACC school.  They are a national program.    You debate if they can stay there or not.  I can handle the argument they are soon to fall out. No one besides grandpa cares about what happened in the 80s or 90s or whatever tradition you want to toot about.   My kid isn't turning on Notre Dame on NBC.   Present day TV eyeballs don't care.  And it's not about comparing Clemson to Bama in terms of viewership.  It's about the edge they would have on teams right beneath that Bama tier.  Which totally would be relevant in a 12 team CFP environment. 

Clemson not only has a good fanbase...but unlike say a South Carolina team, Clemson has real nationwide hate. Love it or hate, they have legit personality.   Which is basically the point.  And it's unique.   It's why SEC talking head Paul Finnebaum has spent the last decade fixated on them.  And Dabo Swinney is 100% a key driver of that relevance/interest/added hate component.  Lose him and it changes Clemson in many ways.  They immediately become irrelevant IMO in the national convo.  

I don't think Deion continues coaching.   We have done this dance.  It was about his son and nothing else.  Latest example was that last Heisman pitch they made to the voters.  HeisMEN and his son prioritized first over Hunter.  I'm just saying he would be a Dabo on steroids.  So you take a random SEC/Big10 school A and random school B and make them equal.  If Deion is coaching one of those, the CFP is going to put them in.  So that matters more than slight scheduling tinkering or SOS or whatever.  It's all a money game in the end.  It's a show in the end. 

The problem is the ACC is no longer what you think it is. They are viewed as the 3rd biggest power 5 conference behind the SEC and Big 10. Sadly it's just not enough to be a Nat'l powerhouse. Most of the schools that do numbers are from the SEC. When you talk college football it all starts with the SEC.

 

The ACC has fell off it's been a while since I considered them the big Dawgs. Hell I might have been a teenager the last time the ACC were the big Dawgs of college football.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

The problem is the ACC is no longer what you think it is. They are viewed as the 3rd biggest power 5 conference behind the SEC and Big 10. Sadly it's just not enough to be a Nat'l powerhouse. Most of the schools that do numbers are from the SEC. When you talk college football it all starts with the SEC.

 

The ACC has fell off it's been a while since I considered them the big Dawgs. Hell I might have been a teenager the last time the ACC were the big Dawgs of college football.

When did anyone ever view the ACC as anything other than the 3rd or even 4th best football conference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...