Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread

KingKucci

By KingKucci,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Who has Clemson beat?

 

Texas plays in the SEC. That's respect in itself.

2 more teams presently ranked in the top 25 than Texas has.  

yes yes, they play in the SEC.  A tale old as time.    

you didn’t address my point in either post.  Reality is the top of the SEC is weaker now than it has been.  What we see with the SEC is the bottom and middle improving.  This current Texas and UGA team wouldn’t belong in most of the final 4s from prior years.  They would be the 4th team smashed that didn’t belong.  

so yeah, Texas would have to win 4 straight.  That gives them the worst odds given everyone is meh out of the “favorites”.   I’ll take Oregon.   The former PAC12 team.   And even they aren’t good by old standards.  Trash Cade Klubnik got better production than their Heisman candidate. 

* please note at no time have I called Clemson good.  They are a shell of older Clemson teams.  They haven’t played 1 compete game all season.   The point is there are no powerhouse teams right now in college football.  These are not the SEC teams of old at the top.  They are clearly weaker.  What we saw was them get weaker and the SC, Vandys, etc get better 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

What’s really funny is saying Vandy would win the ACC, take it from someone that knows, sometimes it’s best just not to post anything when drunk / high

Sir I'm high off the gym. These are good clean energy thoughts. I don't abuse drugs. If I'm high off anything it's the whey protein from my smoothie.

 

Hit the gym bro get you some clean energy thoughts like me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CRA said:

2 more teams presently ranked in the top 25 than Texas has.  

yes yes, they play in the SEC.  A tale old as time.    

you didn’t address my point in either post.  Reality is the top of the SEC is weaker now than it has been.  What we see with the SEC is the bottom and middle improving.  This current Texas and UGA team wouldn’t belong in most of the final 4s from prior years.  They would be the 4th team smashed that didn’t belong.  

so yeah, Texas would have to win 4 straight.  That gives them the worst odds given everyone is meh out of the “favorites”.   I’ll take Oregon.   The former PAC12 team.   And even they aren’t good by old standards.  Trash Cade Klubnik got better production than their Heisman candidate. 

* please note at no time have I called Clemson good.  They are a shell of older Clemson teams.  They haven’t played 1 compete game all season.   The point is there are no powerhouse teams right now in college football.  These are not the SEC teams of old at the top.  They are clearly weaker.  What we saw was them get weaker and the SC, Vandys, etc get better 

 

 

If Clemson is no good then we have no issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Vandy beat Alabama. The point is any team in the SEC can with any team on any Saturday. That conference is deep and loaded. 

 

Vandy would probably win the ACC if we being honest.

They couldn’t even run through the Sun Belt conference undefeated based on this season.  They lost to Georgia State.   Folks have been playing this nonsensical SEC trinkle down overhype game for a long time.  

Bama wouldn’t have gone through the ACC undefeated this year if they caught the wrong schedule.  Why? Because the top of the SEC doesn’t have great teams this year vs years past.  They just got talented rosters.  

Miami, Clemson, SMU, Syracuse, Louisville, GT, Duke.  I don’t think any SEC team THIS year could run through those 7 and not catch an L.   Old top SEC teams could
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If Clemson is no good then we have no issues.

Good is relative.  They aren’t good by the standard of what a good Clemson team is.   Better than the last 3 years if healthy but still not good. 

which also is true about present day Bama, OSU, etc.  Which remains my point.  The top of college football is weaker vs the past.  It’s weak this year.  Any of these teams can catch an L from a host of teams to a degree that wasn’t there not long ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Sir I'm high off the gym. These are good clean energy thoughts. I don't abuse drugs. If I'm high off anything it's the whey protein from my smoothie.

 

Hit the gym bro get you some clean energy thoughts like me.

This might be the best argument to do drugs in the history of the world. LOL

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, PappyMay said:

I have no clue how we can start 3 guards and be this bad at shooting the 3 ball. Jackson HAS to be a starter to give us a little more size if these guards can’t shoot from deep and his offense is just as good. Living in Birmingham it hurts my soul that we lost to both Auburn and Alabama.  Thank God most here don’t care about NFL football or being a Carolina sport fan would be even harder.

No offensive system to create open shots and no inside presence to suck the D in. End result is guards taking a lot of bad shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

Lastest Ive heard about UNC and bill, they are still flirting. Bill is not the HC. 

I think he's demanding his terms and thus far UNC has agreed. 

Just crazy to believe this.

He's keeps upping the terms and demands. 

I feel its 50/50, still a huge part of me is like "hell no, this would never happen".....but its too far given they have met more than 5 times now. 

UNC next step is public pressure. 

My bingo card hass too many "1 out of 10 billion" odds filled this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Lastest Ive heard about UNC and bill, they are still flirting. Bill is not the HC. 

I think he's demanding his terms and thus far UNC has agreed. 

Just crazy to believe this.

He's keeps upping the terms and demands. 

I feel its 50/50, still a huge part of me is like "hell no, this would never happen".....but its too far given they have met more than 5 times now. 

UNC next step is public pressure. 

My bingo card hass too many "1 out of 10 billion" odds filled this year. 

If he is moving the ask like that fug him.  He is playing games

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Shocker said:

If he is moving the ask like that fug him.  He is playing games

Others know but the portal is already open and players have entered. I believe UNC even lost a player or two already. UNC wants his confirmation, Bill keeps adding terms.....AND UNC keeps saying "Ok". 

Still regardless about what others have said, Hes not the HC currently.

It's like Bill didn't believe they would agree to his first mountain of demands and now its like he keeps adding more hoping they quit giving the "OK".  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

UNC is really painted into a corner now and old Bill probably knows it. Here the whole sports world is expecting Belichick to UNC to be announced imminently. Imagine not hiring him now? Whatever poor bastard you hire instead better make Nick Saban look like Matt Rhule in comparison. Oh, you know who wouldn't have lost that game? The greatest coach of all-time who wanted this fuging job. Lord, it would be brutal. Might as well just name Kitchens the permanent replacement and fire him after two or three poo seasons and just try the whole process over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • strato
      Where panthers draft ranked against Big Boards in 2023

      By strato · Posted

      Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • PleaseCutStewart
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By PleaseCutStewart · Posted

      Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...